does this mean the Bush Administration would have been just fine about invading any other middle eastern dictatorships with a ruthless dictator? There are plenty of nations to choose from. How about Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Yemen, Bahrain, Qatar, Omar, or Dubai?
After all, Bush said that if he knew what he knew now, he still would have invaded Iraq.
But no, instead he disregarded the Intelligence reports that came right before we invaded in March of 2003 which stated there is no hard evidence to confirm Saddam has a nuclear arms development program.
Don't you agree that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld should admit there was no good reason to invade Iraq? Because if we are going to invade Iraq, we might as well invade nearly every other middle eastern nation and regime.
2006-10-30
07:47:02
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Military