I have read many research papers / books by academics, who provide different interpretations / conclusions about one particular issue.
Normally, academics, who work at university, are respected for their supposed objectivity and accuracy. So why are there so many different conclusions? There must be one who's right, and another's wrong? And if two academics give two different conclusions, how can both of them retain their job? It makes one feel there is no standard to judge their works.
2006-10-26
00:21:24
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Higher Education (University +)