This to me seems very plain and is reason enough to reject islam, xianty and judiasm which propound an active God who was and is tediously involved in human affairs.
If God really is tediously involved in human affairs and we just cant see him, now we have the problem of a non-sensical or cruel God who kills infants with cancer and doesnt save the school children from the terrorists bomb.
To me, this seems so clear...I just dont get how people intellectually reconsile the two. The claim that "we know not his ways and will understand in the after-life" is circular and a cop-out. If we debate the concept of an active God, it is circular, in the face of absurdity (infant with cancer) require me to assume that, if we assume God exists and is active, then we cannot hope to understand "his way" cause we are lesser....again...you ask me to assume that which we debate.
2006-08-03
11:37:59
·
41 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality