Why do people insenuate that Shaquille O'Neal was the sole reason the Lakers won the Championship? Basketball is a team sport and it was obviously the triangle offense that won the Lakers dynasty those rings. It was Shaq AND Kobe, a combined effort, and neither were more responsible than the other, regardless of what either of them or you crazy fans might think.
Kobe Bryant is carrying the Lakers on his back right now, and has them in the playoffs, but it's obvious they won't win. What does that mean? It means one man can win games, but only teams can win championships. Shaq didn't win the Heat a Championship, either. Just like in LA, it was a combination of Shaq and a supreme gaurd in Dwayne Wade. It's disrespectful to Wade to say that the Heat won because of Shaq. So anyone who argues "look what's happened to Shaq as compared to Kobe" to prove that Shaq is a better player is obviously false. W/O Wade, Shaq isn't winning a title this year either.
What is your take and why?
2007-03-28
05:54:33
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Adam C
4