okay to start with, i will bring up nash's weaknesses, his poor defense, no championships, and uh...well..i think thats it. i wont argue with anyone about those two things. but, crazy as it sounds, his no-D should be one of the main reasons he gets MVP consideration, what he does on offense is so great it practically overshadows everything else. because of the way he plays the suns are an elite team, (jordans bulls were elite) cant say that for kobe(please dont say the lakes are elite this year) or lebron. D-wade cant make heat reach playoffs without superman,(please dont say nash cant do it without amare). only valid case would be Dirk, but without Dirk dallas could still win the West because they are rediculously deep, Dallas' play doesnt solely revolve arould Dirk. Are all these players better players than Nash? maybe. but you have to credit nash for one the quickest and biggest turnarounds for a team in NBA history, and for the past couple seasons he's proven it wasnt a fluke. MVP
2007-02-12
00:33:30
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Antonio G
2