Mark Jackson is better but it's close:
My reasons:
He ranks second in NBA history with 10,334 assist, he's averaged 2 double doubles threw out a season(87-88, 96-97), possesses 17 triple doubles, been to the finals(further then Nash ever been),
his assist high is 22 v.s. New Jersey 01-29-97, his rebound high is 16 v.s. Vancouver 1-22-97, named NBA rookie of the year(87-88),
matched the nba record for assist in one quarter(12) v.s. The Nets 1-20-97, appeared in the 1989 NBA All-Star Game, made five 3 pointers in one game v.s. Boston 4-20-89, his season best in assist is 11.4 apg, he ranks 20th in career steals with 1,608, he had better DEFENSE then Nash, and overall he was bigger & stronger then Nash.
Now to all you people who's letting the hype about Nash FOOL you. Nash is an average player that plays on the same level as a Mark Jackson. Nash is no MVP and never should of been! Mark Jackson didn't get props like that and he's better or as good as Nash in assist! That's racist!
2007-02-11
11:04:16
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Hack-O-Shaq
2