Bibby is the heart and soul of the Kings; if the Kings trade Bibby, they would lose their identity.
I'm still upset that they traded Peja, Hedu, Scott Pollard and Bobby. Vlade was getting too long in the tooth.
2007-02-11 19:03:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by MenifeeManiac 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
aight well Drew Gooden defiantly isn't a slouch this season his been a monster on the offensive boards and his really stepped up when LeBrons had a bad game. Bibby is a great player but personaly i wouldnt want him with the Cavs... in the short term sure he will make the Cavs a better team but Daniel Gibson has some real potential, his got an awsum shot on him and was i the only one that saw him take on Shaq even tho he ways twice his weight? Gibson is gonna help the Cavs out alot next season and many MANY seasons to come besides i dont see why Kings wuld wanna lose Bibby his their centre peice
2007-02-11 20:18:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure if that does anything for either side. The Kings would need a point guard after trading away bibby, and they don't need another bigman; they already have Miller, Abdur-Raheem, Williams, Thomas, and arguably Artest. While he Cavs are in need of a point-guard, I don't think Bibby is the answer, considering that he's best with the ball in his hands and the Cavs already have LeBron, Hughes, ect. to dominate the ball. Also, while the Cavs are a good rebounding team overall, losing Gooden would seriously weaken the Cavs frontline.
2007-02-11 19:29:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Robin 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
this would be a bad commerce for the Cavaliers. Mike Bibby isn't the shooter the cavs choose. He shot 40% from the sector, and he wasn't efficient from the three pt arc. he's not even the factor shelter we choose. He purely averaged 4 assists final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days! Bibby is a bum, and we gained't address his settlement. We have already got Hughes making 14 million a 300 and sixty 5 days. The Cavs do no longer choose yet another Larry Hughes. to no longer point out that Drew Gooden is like 25 years previous, and he's already a double double guy each and every sport. Gooden is basically going to get greater efficient. And if the Cavs traded Gooden who would initiate at potential forward? Marshall? The Cavs will possibly no longer even get Varejoa back even however that's looking like they're going to, yet you by no potential comprehend. this would be a bad commerce for the Cavaliers, and it might set them back very much.
2016-11-03 05:28:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bibby wouldn't be worth anything to the Cavs in a trade. The Cavs need Gooden far more than they would ever need Bibby.
2007-02-11 19:16:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by drbuns 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
For the sake of the Cavaliers, I'd hate to see that happen. But for the sake of the Kings, they would probably be better off if it did.
For multiple reasons, Bibby has been nothing but weak this season. Kevin Martin and Ron Artest are the ones who have kept that team alive. Bibby has suddenly become the one who constantly drags them down. It probably would be just as well if they did trade him.
2007-02-11 20:23:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Emma 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no
2007-02-11 19:07:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by V-Train 2
·
0⤊
0⤋