As homosexual "sex" is clearly not sex in the penile-vaginal penetration / procreation notion of the term, should we call it something else?
Just as in the homosexual marriage arguments, their union is considered by some to not meet the definition of "marriage" and thus would need to be called something else.
So, question #2, if we call it something else, would it still be sinful for being an unnatural form of "sex". Clearly not, as it is not "sex".
Similarly, merely kissing and hugging and caressing (not sex) do not lead to procreation. Since we don't call these things "sex", we also shouldn't call homosexual relations "sex" and thus, shouldn't call homosexual relations "unnatural"? How can we say a man kissing a woman is natural, but a woman kissing a woman is not?
Thoughts?
2006-12-03
10:11:41
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Phoenix, Wise Guru
7