English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-03 10:01:29 · 23 answers · asked by *stay*sweetly*numb* 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

before you all keep writing is this a serious question, i must add that i am doing a presentation on the Holocaust and i didnt want to present any false information so i just wanted to be sure! thanks for all the answers guys this is awsome!

2006-12-03 10:12:46 · update #1

23 answers

its hard to discern whether or not hitler was antisemitic just by reviewing history, but some of his writings and speeches seemed to have had a bit of an antisemitic slant to them on occasion, and so while i hesitate to outright accuse the man of antisemitism, i think its fairly safe to say that there is enough evidence to assume that he may, in fact, have been at least mildly antisemitic.

EDIT

"Luther did not hate Jews as a race. He got "exasperated" at the Jewish religion for refusing to believe in Christ after having seen the Protestant side of the question presented. He was "anti-Jewish religion". His attitude was not the best, but it is not the same as antisemitism."

i think the fact that he wrote the book "On The Jews And Their Lies" might dispute that rosy little view. somehow the title implies that he is not so much "anti-jewish-religion" as he is "very hateful of jews".

what did he discuss in his book, "On The Jews And Their Lies"? well, here are some topics he dealt with:
- he said jews should be persecuted "harshly"
- he said our synagogues and schools should be set on fire
- he said our prayerbooks should be destroyed
- he said our homes should be razed
- he said our rabbis should be forbidden to preach to us
- he said our property and money should be confiscated
- he said jews should be shown no mercy or kindness
- he said that we should have no legal protection
- he called us "poisonous, venoumous worms"
- he said we should be forced into forced labour or expelled for all time

the protestants really picked a great role model...

2006-12-03 10:06:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oh boy! that's a tough one to answer. Let's see, he only wanted to have all Jews killed as "the final solution". So maybe he was just moderately antisemitic?
EDIT:
Someone referred to Martin Luther.
Luther did not hate Jews as a race. He got "exasperated" at the Jewish religion for refusing to believe in Christ after having seen the Protestant side of the question presented. He was "anti-Jewish religion". His attitude was not the best, but it is not the same as antisemitism.

2006-12-03 10:06:43 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Ed 7 · 0 0

I don`t want to get hung for this but the latest research has discovered that Hitler was actually descended from the Jews in that his Maternal Grandmother was a Jewess, and that the Jewish Bankers aka, Rothschilds and Warburgs and others, used Hitler to annihalate the poor working Jews of the ghettos in their plan to form the Zionist state of modern Israel.

2006-12-03 10:12:52 · answer #3 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0 1

Gee wilikers, let me think about that for a while.

1.Hitler saw a bunch of rich Jews living in Berlin.
2.He robbed them of all their money.
3.He arrested them and sent them to prison (crowded prisons were called concentration camps (about 10 people per rooms the size of your bathroom.)
4.He worked them to death, without feeding them.
5.Then when they were not dying fast enough, so he put them in Gas chambers and burned them to death.

Then you asked us if Hitler was anti-semitic.

What part of anti-semite don't you understand?

2006-12-03 10:10:27 · answer #4 · answered by MrsOcultyThomas 6 · 0 0

I don't know, let me see...6 million Jews died at his hands. Yeah, that definitely qualifies. And josie m is right, so was Martin Luther..but why stop there. Take a close look at most religious leaders and you find the same sentiments.

2006-12-03 10:08:44 · answer #5 · answered by Gabby 4 · 0 0

Obviously

2006-12-03 10:03:56 · answer #6 · answered by t a m i l 6 · 2 0

It is absolutely amazing to me that anyone as intelligent as you seem to be would ask such a question. with respect, I must assume you are very young and still have a way to go in your education.
I Cr 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!
12-3-6

2006-12-03 10:06:37 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

maybe you need to stop watchin flavr of love and start reading..

once you find out exactly who hitler was and the enormity in what he did..you will realize why people would wonder if it's a serious question...

it's somewhat akin to asking if the grass is green

2006-12-03 10:08:52 · answer #8 · answered by KED 4 · 0 0

John factors out "Horseshoe Politics" - i presumed-about that one myself years in the past. once you're severe adequate, no matter if left or perfect-wing, it finally ends up a similar - authoritarian. it really is what fascism ability. The fasces (an awl with timber sticks sure round it) became the emblem of ability in historic Rome. contained in the authentic which technique of the be conscious, once you're fascist, you've faith in having ability and making everyone else believe you. What they ought to believe you about is yet another remember. I save in ideas 5 years in the past even as a member of the BNP became elected to the London assembly, and shortly after there became a protest march in London hostile to a fascist being elected. i presumed, "carry close on, isn't it fascist to call for that he be bumped off purely because you don't love him?" they'd the incorrect which technique of fascist - because of Hitler and Mussolini, human beings imagine it ability "racist" even though it doesn't. it really is all by way of pointing out that attempting to in high quality condition each and every thing on a scale of left to perfect doesn't continually artwork, and it actually doesn't with Hitler. it is also smart now to not believe issues in politics are authentic purely because they are on the label. "Socialist" became contained in the Nazi get mutually's call, yet were they? As Mugwumps says, seem at what the Nazis did and also you will see ideas from everywhere in the political spectrum. huge public spending - it really is socialist. helping and encouraging huge inner most organizations - it really is no longer socialist. on the right of the day, there is purely one worry-free subject - the flexibility of Germany (and fantastically Hitler himself) and eradication of Jews. And being fascist to get what he needed. maximum of why he became anti-Communist became that he talked about it as yet another Jewish plot - Karl Marx, inspite of each and every thing, became a Jew. huge public spending became to arm Germany for conquest. Encouraging huge inner most organizations which includes Krupps were given protection rigidity hardware made.

2016-11-30 02:36:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Um, the ghosts of 6 million annhilated Jews would probably say "yes." And I suspect all the thousands upon thousands of people who survived the death camps would say "yes" too.

2006-12-03 10:05:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers