OK, since evolutionists love to come into this category anyway, why not answer a question directed toward you.
Some of you who are atheists or agnostics use evolution as your crutch. You even have the audacity to call what you believe The Theory of Evolution when, in actuality, it should be called The Hypothesis of Evolution.
There is no PROOF that man evolved. Yes, we adapted (e.g., we no longer use our appendix, we have grown), but we have NOT evolved. No proof exists that we came from another species. Therefore, to call your concept the Theory of Evolution is incorrect.
How can you say something is a theory when it hasn't been proven? As Webster says, your theory may be "a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena ," but it hasn't been proven.
Since proving this and proving that seems to be your mantra, shouldn't you focus more on proving YOUR case than trying to disprove ours?
-a Creationist
2006-07-11
04:07:51
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous