is it not enough that we go blow up a country and then rebuild it?
is it not enough that we send our fine, young, healthy lads to fight warring sectarian factions of muslims in iraq, in danger of loss of limb or life?
why is it our responsibility to quell the civil war in iraq?
now that saddam is dead (by their own court's decision), why can't they, themselves, agree to governing themselves?
if so many people were terrorized by hussain, why did we not witness a mass exodus of its citizens years ago, but we are seeing it now?
why can't sunnis, shia, and kurds (and maybe more) just build walls partitioning themselves from one another? like in mexico, where brick walls 10' tall are built, with broken glass pieces stuck into morter on the top?
why should it now become our responsibility to suddenly welcome 7,000 iraqis into the usa? we only took in about 1,300 in all the years since the iraqi war.
won't bush be to blame for more terrorism from within?
2007-02-15
09:30:51
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Louiegirl_Chicago
5