Economics - October 2006

everyone will agree that taking 90% of income off 90% of people will cause violence - money is a joker good, good for almost all goods, including all necessities - therefore the theft of it is the greatest injury - causing the greatest [righteous] anger and resentment - we have worse injustice than this - therefore everyone will have to agree that the injustice is the cause of the violence , and therfore that only removing the real cause will remove the violence

violence is not caused by human nature: proof: injustice and violence have escalated for 1000s of years - therefore violence was at one time much less - but human nature has not changed - if human nature has not changed and violence has changed, then clearly human nature is not the cause

can anyone appreciate this logic, ie, take on board this logic, or will people illogically continue to go on believing that human nature is the cause of wars?

happiness is totally dependent on realisticness

hpns & unrlty nvr meet

2006-10-05 21:45:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-05 21:07:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

can you descibe to their role and what are their area of coordination...thanks

2006-10-05 17:18:34 · 1 answers · asked by ice_cream_chico11 1

2006-10-05 16:28:18 · 5 answers · asked by Midnight Ceres 2

2006-10-05 15:23:43 · 8 answers · asked by tinkerbell 1

No jokes

2006-10-05 14:33:17 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-05 10:35:58 · 7 answers · asked by Jacks036 5

I'm 15 and taking more interest in wordly things lately, I've noticed how business is always trying things to cheat its customers. Look at the way they have got round the 'Organic' rules. I don't think I will be able to just lay down and do nothing.

2006-10-05 10:34:46 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

are we very very very gravely underestimating the effects of greed [overpay]? - are we being indulgent to greed to our great great great cost? is greed the cause of almost all violence [war and crime]? is it our indulgence of greed [overpay] that is racing us from misery to extinction? we have allowed unlimited fortunes, contrary to the wisdom of the founding fathers of america, the bible, every wise person and the lesson of history - we have unlimited overpay and unlimited underpay - pay up to million times average, and 90% of people on less than 10th of average - although [broadly speaking, in general] everyone is working - clearly getting out less than a 10th of what you put in to society is a cause of resentment - 1 in 50 people a year getting out so much less than they put in that they starving to death or getting killed in war and crime is a cause of resentment, anger, frustration, rage, hatred, fury, bitterness, madness

extreme injustice extreme violence extrm extinc

2006-10-05 09:32:30 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

To avoid quibbles about the meaning of words, let me first make the following definitions. 100% Capitalism is an economic system in which all property and means of production are privately owned. 100% Communism is a system in which all property and means of production are owned by no one at all; in other words, they are simply commonly shared. I maintain that neither system is feasible.

Imagine a 100% Capitalist system. Someone owns every stretch of road and every stretch of sidewalk. Every time you enter another "landlord's" stretch of street or sidewalk, you may well have to pay a toll. Is this tenable? Of course not.

And every time you want to take a jog on a running track that currently exists because of park service efforts, you would have to pay something. Your fat friends would be richer than you are.

But if no one owned anything, no one would be motivated to improve the quality of anything. When a street light burns out, who would replace it? No one.

2006-10-05 06:27:50 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-05 05:49:56 · 11 answers · asked by crispdew 1

Why is a Sausage Biscuit from McDonalds only $1.00, but a plain biscuit, no sausage, is $1.09? It takes no extra effort to make the biscuit... in fact it takes less. Any ideas?

2006-10-05 04:56:47 · 22 answers · asked by Rainier 5

For example, in the year 2000 or 2001, Bill Gates had over $ 68 Billion dollars, is that neccessary ? Should there be a limit to how much dough you can have. Cause you know they don't work as hard as some of us do !!

2006-10-05 02:32:35 · 16 answers · asked by gangstaboi102987 1

2006-10-05 01:40:40 · 5 answers · asked by lsvettek 2

2006-10-05 01:27:58 · 2 answers · asked by ekta c 1

i need any research .. about the economy..... please

2006-10-05 01:01:26 · 4 answers · asked by ksha_xprx 1

as he has never told me any word i can't say anything, too.so i must explain him only by my behavior.when hi is looking at me with widely open eyes:(it's very unpleasant for me.................

2006-10-05 00:07:05 · 13 answers · asked by guliana 1

2006-10-04 22:24:34 · 1 answers · asked by Alexandru G 1

We are dudes. We don't care what other folks are using/wearing. When I find something I like I want to continue using it. For example for 15 years or more I used the same deoderant. It worked. The ladies liked the scent. Then they had to come up with a new and improved. Took me a year to find a new brand I liked because new in this case didn't work. I find myself when I find a prouduct I like stocking up on it. I do this with razors, shirts, boots, shades what ever else I really like. Some guys hate change. So they buy out of habit period. Me I like what works. I'll try new stuff. I was never happy with either boxers or breifs for underwear. When the boxer briefs came out I tried them and that's all I buy now. It's not change, it's the changing of things that work to things that don't work. So my question is why do men's product manufacturers constantly change things up. We are guys. We want to go in and buy something we know works. One less thing to bother with.

2006-10-04 21:48:59 · 4 answers · asked by draciron 7

2006-10-04 21:45:58 · 8 answers · asked by arvindkoshal2001 1

......

2006-10-04 21:36:10 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

it seems to me that there is a limit to the amount one can contribute to society and that therefore one should not take out more than we put in by our work - otherwise we are stealing, and thereby creating injustice, overpay and underpay [which grows endlessly] creating righteous anger and violence which also escalates endlessly and thus makes us unsafe and in danger and having to go to war and having to fight and pay for crime [in money and person]

the social pool of wealth is filled by products of work, and so taking out more than we put in has to deprive others unjustly, ruining our own happiness with the danger, anger and resentment, the escalation of war [to extinction soon]

good liberty always stops short of depriving others of liberty

the market is no judge of how much we contribute, because the market pays for scarcity and other things which are not our contribution

[we now have pay from $1 to $1 billion for a fortnight's work]

do you think i am right, or wrong?

2006-10-04 21:22:55 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-04 21:11:02 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-04 19:27:45 · 3 answers · asked by Keith M 1

2006-10-04 19:02:11 · 1 answers · asked by Fatman 1

I would like to know the 7 C's of communication. Please give examples of all, specially of "Completeness". I'm unable to find any thing relavant to it. Thanks.

2006-10-04 16:36:12 · 3 answers · asked by Omar Zuberi 2

...that those "free" credit score sites are actually a ploy used by creditors searching for people who have unpaid credit debt? My advice; if you don't want them harassing you, do not fill these out!!

2006-10-04 16:17:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Does any one think that we may be headed for a big crash, bigger than the great depression?

2006-10-04 16:05:11 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

...that those "free" credit score sites are actually a ploy used by creditors searching for people who have unpaid credit debt? My advice; if you don't want them harassing you, do not fill these out!!

2006-10-04 15:46:18 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-04 15:22:57 · 8 answers · asked by ? 6