everyone will agree that taking 90% of income off 90% of people will cause violence - money is a joker good, good for almost all goods, including all necessities - therefore the theft of it is the greatest injury - causing the greatest [righteous] anger and resentment - we have worse injustice than this - therefore everyone will have to agree that the injustice is the cause of the violence , and therfore that only removing the real cause will remove the violence
violence is not caused by human nature: proof: injustice and violence have escalated for 1000s of years - therefore violence was at one time much less - but human nature has not changed - if human nature has not changed and violence has changed, then clearly human nature is not the cause
can anyone appreciate this logic, ie, take on board this logic, or will people illogically continue to go on believing that human nature is the cause of wars?
happiness is totally dependent on realisticness
hpns & unrlty nvr meet
2006-10-05
21:45:48
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Economics