Economics - October 2006

i want them in order

2006-10-31 00:24:13 · 5 answers · asked by Andrew M 1

Where do they get the money from, then?

2006-10-31 00:20:49 · 38 answers · asked by tulip 4

2006-10-30 22:54:49 · 8 answers · asked by REUS CHRISTIAN CASTILLO O 1

2006-10-30 22:41:15 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 22:40:22 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please help its a school assignment!

2006-10-30 19:47:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think a national company can do a better job than a private one. Is a national company more prone to corruption/ineffeciency than a private one. For instance some countries have a nationalized media (i.e. BBC, CBC). Are these automatically pro-govt? Others have privatized media. Are these subservient to sponsors? How about utilites? Natural resources? Defense industry? Security? Military? Or maybe it depends on the situation?

2006-10-30 17:57:57 · 7 answers · asked by Brandon 3

Hi, i should make a project for my school , i must research about these questions, please help me to make tish project :
1- What are globalization and the global economy?
2- How can a country be competitive in the global market place?
3- How does globalization affect a country’s “balance of payment”?
thanks

2006-10-30 17:57:41 · 4 answers · asked by Ali P 1

who is answerable to this mishap...?

2006-10-30 16:35:03 · 11 answers · asked by vikas n 2

2006-10-30 16:20:48 · 2 answers · asked by Scrips Tracker 1

I wouldn't mind a few extra dollars myself, but I prefer to actually work for my money instead of getting it out of pity for what happend several generations ago. Besides, by accepting reparations as compensation for what happened, they're putting a dollar ammount on the suffering that their ancestors endured, which doesn't seem right either.

2006-10-30 15:12:46 · 16 answers · asked by FireKracker187 2

I would like California Statistics and general US salary statistics. Thanks.

2006-10-30 15:11:34 · 1 answers · asked by Johnny R 2

2006-10-30 13:29:03 · 10 answers · asked by mikeygonebad2007 1

Basic economics principles state that when supply is high and demand is Low then price is Low. There is a huge supply of women to handle the demand in fact at least three women could handle every one demand.

2006-10-30 13:23:46 · 11 answers · asked by slowneckme 1

I saw this thing on pbs where this expert economist was saying that there is a group of landowners who own regions covering different states and owning conglomerate companies that is really calling the shots in wallstreet and washington dc.It makes sense in a way because american policy seems completely incompetent serving the people and providing world peace, instead its like capitalism to the extreme degree where profits are the only thing.

2006-10-30 12:21:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 10:49:35 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 10:48:17 · 10 answers · asked by L-meister 2

The article can be found at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/30/business/media/31papercnd.html?ref=business

Can someone please explain what curves shift, supply and demand, and in which direction and why they shift that way?

Thank you.

2006-10-30 10:37:02 · 1 answers · asked by The One And Only 1

If it werent for energy efficiency we would still be living in caves. It is energy efficient improvements in our work (energy), that has taken human civilisation to our present predicament. The History of human civilisation is a story of energy efficient improvements in work practises. But instead of realising we have enough, that we are rich enough, and having a long long holiday to let the rest of the world catch up, We get fatter and fatter on the more and more **** that we stuff our whale like mouths, and chuck away. Ha. what would you do with the money you saved on energy efficiency? take a break. no way! you would add more **** to your pile, and cause more global warming! This is what we do. RENEWABLES are the answer. that and sharing the wealth and have a lifetime holiday, give the earth a break and us too! Now theres a new angle! Permaculture here we go,

2006-10-30 10:27:32 · 5 answers · asked by green_womble 1

It is an econimic term .Defenition is " A person who uses resources to make goods and provides services". I have to help her with her homework.

2006-10-30 10:07:19 · 6 answers · asked by Manisha A 1

surely this is time to surmount capitalism and do what has to be done for our future, for our future, not for a few dollars more?

2006-10-30 10:04:59 · 6 answers · asked by paul 1

2006-10-30 09:14:54 · 3 answers · asked by C VANDIKE R 1

help im a dumby i cant spell what do i do?

2006-10-30 09:14:41 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-30 08:21:38 · 3 answers · asked by Collett Demetrius 1

GDP does not include the value of used goods that are resold. Why would including such transactions make GDP a less informative measure of economic well being?

2006-10-30 08:12:04 · 5 answers · asked by Soccer Stud 2

Suppose that a borrower and a lender agree on the nominal interest rate to be paid on a loan. Then inflation turns out to be higher than they both expected.



a. Is the real interest rate on this loan higher or lower than expected?


b. Does the lender gain or lose from this unexpectedly high inflation? Does the borrower gain or lose?


c. Inflation during the 1970s was much higher than most people had expected when the decade began. How did this affect homeowners who obtained a fixed rated mortgages during the 1960s? How did it affect the banks that lent the money?

2006-10-30 07:42:37 · 4 answers · asked by Soccer Stud 2

does any bank exchange all other foreign money into us money?

2006-10-30 07:42:31 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Beginning in 1994, environmental regulations have required that gasoline contain a new additive to reduce air pollution. This requirement raised the cost of gasoline. The Bureau of Labor Statistics deide that this increase in cost represented an improvement in quality.

a. Given this decision, did the increased cost of gasoline raise the CPI?

b. What is the argument in favor of the BLS's decision? What is the argument for a different decision?

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

2006-10-30 07:24:13 · 2 answers · asked by Soccer Stud 2

question1: assume a monopolist operates in a marlet with demand dunction p=100-4q. Marginal cost =4 no matter how many units are produced.
(a) what price will maximise the sum of producer and consumer surplus in this market?
(b) what is the price set by the monopolist?
(c) what is the loss in consumer surplus resulting from monopoly? Illustrate graphically.
(d) why is the monopoly outcome inefficient?

also explain how you get to your answer.

2006-10-30 06:51:00 · 4 answers · asked by dennis s 3

2006-10-30 06:07:56 · 14 answers · asked by you dont need to know 1