My wife and sister-in-law are of the opinion that promiscuous women are almost one and all victims of some sort of childhood/adolecent molestation or rape. This would include strippers, pornstars, and prostitutes. Therefore, support or promotion of the above activities is by proxy support of child molesters. They seem to be of the opinion that there are no, or at least very very few, naturally occuring promiscuous women. I admit this all seems to have some truth to it. I could see how a girl who has been molested or raped cound be conditioned into thinking "thats all she's good for". However, being the skeptic that I am, I refuse to support their opinion 100% until its validity had been proven by more demanding means. Have there been any studies, ala Masters and Johnson, that shed light on this assumption?
My problem with their opinion is that the molestation factor only applies to female promiscuity. They believe women under normal circumstances are not promiscous, however men are.
2006-09-05
13:48:27
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Alex H
2
in
Psychology