Henry Gee, chief science writer for Nature, wrote in 1999: “The intervals of time that separate fossils are so huge that we cannot say anything definite about their possible connection through ancestry and descent.” Although Gee is a believer in Darwin’s theory, he acknowledged that one must assume the truth of the theory when studying human origins, because by its very nature the fossil record cannot corroborate it. Gee concluded: “To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story--amusing, perhaps even instructive, but not scientific.”
Also there is the lack of high level models for macro evolution. Some proposes Theoretical Genetics, but it applies to micro evolution only. http://www.genetics.org/cgi/content/full/169/1/1
Known mechanisms turn on/off complex information *already available*: http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/mchox.htm
2007-09-01
11:19:26
·
11 answers
·
asked by
My account has been compromised
2