Astronomy & Space - September 2006

2006-09-07 21:32:14 · 4 answers · asked by peter l 1

If thr Big Bang created everything, what preceded it? If there was a "beginning", how could nothing have existed before it?

2006-09-07 20:57:22 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 20:43:51 · 4 answers · asked by Karen A 1

2006-09-07 20:15:07 · 6 answers · asked by samuraihero1992 2

I find this topic very interesting. SecondStar have already asked a question using kamikaze techniques. Instead of that, why not we build a tower that extends until it breaks the gravity. It will need a large base to support the weight but overall this is the most safest idea.

Then simply loading these wastes in capsules and launch it into space towards the sun.

So what do you guys think?

2006-09-07 20:14:34 · 13 answers · asked by Ah Boi 3

2006-09-07 19:24:32 · 15 answers · asked by Fallen 6

2006-09-07 19:15:09 · 9 answers · asked by Hulk. 1

2006-09-07 18:53:02 · 9 answers · asked by annie 2

2006-09-07 18:14:38 · 12 answers · asked by Rohini karthikeyan 3

2006-09-07 18:08:46 · 15 answers · asked by meow 1

is is said that planet is too cool and cant grow vegetation/crops there so they look downward to earth for food offerings from their relatives/descendants.they expect from earth once in a year so that there they get daily as the day is long equal to our one year.

2006-09-07 17:58:13 · 5 answers · asked by gcetpass 1

2006-09-07 17:36:05 · 7 answers · asked by SCS 1

It is so sad that they cannot be proud of the most incredible human accomplishment so far.

It is so sad that armed with bogus information off the internet and no real knowledge of the actual events that they form their opinions.

It is sad that so many great men put their lives on the line for those missions and the kids of today pass it all off as a hoax.

It is so sad that these kids cannot clear their minds of this garbage to see that logically (didn't they all like Mr Spock's logic), logically, it is beyond all reason that you could either fool the 400,000 people that worked on Apollo over 9 years, or get them all to be in on it and keep quiet about it.

It is so sad that they can't think where or how the great army of subversive engineers, techicians, software experts and communications experts crept in unnoticed from the thousands of other experts, to do their subversive deed.

2006-09-07 17:22:16 · 17 answers · asked by nick s 6

and that point itself had no beginning..then the universe is eternal and had no beginning. and if it did have a beginning what was going on before it began???

eternity nothing etertinty nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing eternity nothing, condensed point Big Bang beginning and so on

thats very strange

2006-09-07 16:47:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

name & country

2006-09-07 16:30:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

was condensed into a single point. where did that point come from and why and how did it exist in the first place?and if charges like electrons and protons created it, what are they how do they exist?

2006-09-07 16:27:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 16:11:59 · 9 answers · asked by tom science 4

So, to all you NASA-types in-the-know out there, here's a question for you - my husband and I got into an argument tonight about why they don't just send nuclear waste (which is, he argues, very expensive to hold here on Earth), on a suicidal spaceship into the sun? I responded with my general "Well, if they could do that, they would have by now" routine (too much faith in humanity, I know) but I theorized that the COST of a sort of "kamikaze" spaceship required to carry a load of nuclear waste to the sun would outweigh the expense of housing the waste here on Earth. Are we both way off here? Are there environmental concerns, or other reasons we haven't considered, that we don't just ship our dangerous garbage up to be consumed by the sun's constant explosions? What are we missing? Prove us both equally wrong and you may save a marriage... ;-)

2006-09-07 15:54:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 15:40:17 · 10 answers · asked by karlos 2

Hi everybody! I am interested in identifying planets of Solar system on clear sky nights. I am also interested in seeing Andromeda galexy, which is the only galexy which can be seen from naked eye from earth. Can somebody also help me in identifying stars in Milky way?

2006-09-07 15:36:10 · 5 answers · asked by Indu 1

space shuttle, upon re-entry generates incredible heat on the skin of the shuttle. It enters at 25,000 miles per hour. If it had a nuclear reactor on board to generate power allowing it to slow down, enter at any angle and it could enter in the direction of the earth's rotation, instead of against it. This would eliminate much of the danger of re-entry. Is this possible?

2006-09-07 14:53:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you agree on the demotion of pluto as a planet.

2006-09-07 13:45:57 · 35 answers · asked by Elijah99 1

I mean, do think there is extra- terrestrial life out there somewhere?

2006-09-07 13:27:33 · 18 answers · asked by Amber 2

because if it goes on forever, then there is no scale, so there is everything and nothing., and if its still expanding, then well that just makes no sense and does not bare thinking about, for the obvious reasons! what do you all think!!

2006-09-07 13:21:30 · 18 answers · asked by lee s 1

Last night I looked up at the moon, which was full, and it looked like there was clouds on the moon. What I mean is, it was a bright moon, but with grey spots on it. Does anyone know why?

2006-09-07 13:21:08 · 14 answers · asked by jojo04_2004 2

2006-09-07 13:15:22 · 12 answers · asked by Duh 1

This question is in relation to a previous question concerning the 3 terrestial elements currently being used for discussion purposes.
Matter, Dark Matter, Dark Energy. I'm interested in the relationship between the universal expansion and the 'resting place' of captured matter/energy. This has to do (in my tiny brain) with the relationship between the galaxies ability to stay compact instead of spinning off piecemeal into 'space' even though the cosmos is still expanding.

2006-09-07 13:10:16 · 4 answers · asked by Joe Schmo from Kokomo 6

2006-09-07 13:01:26 · 7 answers · asked by nyinyi y 1

Does anyone know of a site or of pictures that can get "up close"?
Everything I see is so "zoomed out".

2006-09-07 13:01:06 · 8 answers · asked by JLLLL 1

2006-09-07 12:58:35 · 18 answers · asked by keℓsey<3 4