Science & Mathematics - 28 June 2006

2006-06-28 04:49:02 · 6 answers · asked by lisa2001bg 1 in Biology

2006-06-28 04:48:02 · 4 answers · asked by WAS 1 in Earth Sciences & Geology

2006-06-28 04:45:01 · 9 answers · asked by ♥D@t_bLaSiaN♥ 5 in Chemistry

Enough with the monsoons and stifling humidity. I feel like an extra in "Brokedown Palace" (see IMBD.com)

2006-06-28 04:42:49 · 3 answers · asked by KGB9108 5 in Weather

At which speed does the earth travel around the sun?
And 'round it's own axis?

2006-06-28 04:42:23 · 9 answers · asked by Il Topo 1 in Earth Sciences & Geology

pharoahmuhammad
3 minutes ago

Do you believe evolution after you read this?
The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct. Failure to meet only one challenge proves the law was wrong. This web page will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one. The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is called a theory instead of a law.

The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many regressive traits. A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists. Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. Diamond back rattle snakes cannot be selectively bred until you have one with wings that jumps in the air and flies away. Evolution is impossible.

The same process is done with flowers, fruit and vegetables. New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals.

If natural selection were true Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless and everyone else. If natural selection were true humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict. If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes should have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except for the Eskimos. Many evolutionist argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.

The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical within each animal that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.

2006-06-28 04:40:36 · 19 answers · asked by 5445 1 in Earth Sciences & Geology

I wanna know if there is a chemical difference and therefore what differnce does this make to washing your clothes.

2006-06-28 04:36:40 · 5 answers · asked by fluxraider 2 in Chemistry

I just cant seem to find the relationship between the energy a certain amount of mass has in relation with the constant of the speed of light...

2006-06-28 04:36:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

I am wondering if intense brain waves (gamma waves, maybe?) could effect ability of cell phone to receive signal.

2006-06-28 04:35:20 · 5 answers · asked by sareggi 1 in Other - Science

2006-06-28 04:32:05 · 10 answers · asked by burkert3283@sbcglobal.net 1 in Chemistry

pharoahmuhammad
3 minutes ago

Do you believe evolution after you read this?
The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct. Failure to meet only one challenge proves the law was wrong. This web page will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one. The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is called a theory instead of a law.

The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many regressive traits. A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists. Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. Diamond back rattle snakes cannot be selectively bred until you have one with wings that jumps in the air and flies away. Evolution is impossible.

The same process is done with flowers, fruit and vegetables. New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals.

If natural selection were true Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless and everyone else. If natural selection were true humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict. If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes should have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except for the Eskimos. Many evolutionist argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.

The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical within each animal that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.

2006-06-28 04:31:34 · 21 answers · asked by 5445 1 in Biology

I am trying to understand the difference between standards and controls that are used in a chem lab

2006-06-28 04:30:01 · 4 answers · asked by John B 1 in Chemistry

Suppose a train is traveling north at a velocity of 100 m/hr. At a certain point thunder falls 50 miles north and 50 miles south of the train at the exact same instant. If you could be able to measure this, which thunder bolt would you see first?

2006-06-28 04:25:52 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Physics

2006-06-28 04:25:31 · 5 answers · asked by sareggi 1 in Weather

The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct. Failure to meet only one challenge proves the law was wrong. This web page will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one. The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is called a theory instead of a law.

The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many regressive traits. A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists. Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. Diamond back rattle snakes cannot be selectively bred until you have one with wings that jumps in the air and flies away. Evolution is impossible.

The same process is done with flowers, fruit and vegetables. New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals.

If natural selection were true Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless and everyone else. If natural selection were true humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict. If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes should have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except for the Eskimos. Many evolutionist argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.

The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical within each animal that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.

2006-06-28 04:25:13 · 4 answers · asked by 5445 1 in Engineering

The Electric Universe is still a "rogue" theory for the "official" science establishment (i.e. universities, scientific institutions, magazines, NASA... ). For the last 30 years, facts pouring from spacecrafts like Hubble and from telescopes in earth have contradicted all the prediction of the Gravitational Universe, so phisycs guided by mathematicians have created ad-hoc creatures like dark matter, dark energy, black holes and so on, no one ever proved to exist, in a effort to avoid the total breakdown of the gravitation universe..., because they dont want to accept that the universe is not electrical neutral, and that electricity is the driven force of galaxies, stars, planets and everything, not gravitation. So they act against electric universe proponents like they did centuries ago with Galileo !!. But time proved Galileo right, so he prevailed against all the power of the scientific, political an church establishment of his time, because he was right, he has the truth.

2006-06-28 04:22:26 · 9 answers · asked by frankois 1 in Astronomy & Space

I mean.. can you do 'it' up there? And if not, is it then acceptable to bang one out??

I mean stuff floats a lot in space...

2006-06-28 04:21:48 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Astronomy & Space

2006-06-28 04:19:46 · 11 answers · asked by jungljn 3 in Earth Sciences & Geology

2006-06-28 04:16:24 · 13 answers · asked by JustThinking 1 in Astronomy & Space

2006-06-28 04:10:05 · 10 answers · asked by gl3nji 1 in Chemistry

Why baldness will not start from sides? It starts from center of the head or from front or little bit back side? why? and Why the bald ness does not spread to sides or complete head?

2006-06-28 04:07:01 · 4 answers · asked by SRINIVASA B 1 in Medicine

First of all, nothing wrong with being pale :) I'm just curious as to why I am so light. Yes, my mother is for practical purposes, a caucasian woman (auburn hair, freckled skin) but my father is Latino and quite dark. I'm am about the same shade as my mother, light skin and green eyes and auburn hair. Shouldn't I be darker than my mum? What genetic factor determines skintone?

2006-06-28 04:01:19 · 5 answers · asked by Lauren J 1 in Biology

2006-06-28 03:59:52 · 5 answers · asked by ARSH 2 in Zoology

2006-06-28 03:59:11 · 5 answers · asked by Als 2 in Chemistry

At night when the stars appear you can see that one of them is really shinning ..it's the biggest and the most shinning star .. so what planet is it?

2006-06-28 03:55:10 · 13 answers · asked by aShIkA 1 in Other - Science

2006-06-28 03:53:47 · 11 answers · asked by J D 1 in Mathematics

2006-06-28 03:53:42 · 3 answers · asked by Timbers Mom 2 in Weather

that a meteor is gonna fly by earth on monday???

2006-06-28 03:51:07 · 17 answers · asked by woody r 2 in Astronomy & Space

2006-06-28 03:47:59 · 24 answers · asked by DIANE 1 in Biology

I've never fully understood it. For example, my mother has blue-grey eyes, my father has brown and I have greenish-blue. In addition to that my husband has brown eyes and my son has blue eyes. Weird, no?

2006-06-28 03:47:42 · 23 answers · asked by Lauren J 1 in Biology