Politics - 6 December 2007

Democrats have every other news orginization on earth, although to Republicans they are all wrong While Fox News stands alone as the only beacon of Truth in a world wide forest of wrongful liberal media.

2007-12-06 12:45:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

WHY?

2007-12-06 12:37:02 · 24 answers · asked by The prophet of DOOM 5

I mean if his name was something like Osama Bisheaqui or something, would it not be screamed all over the news media as yet another terrorist attack? Most certainly a dastardly deed by any means. In other words, do we not have terrorist born here after generastions, or it it just Muslims that are terrorists? Or should we just ask the victims and their loved ones?

2007-12-06 12:30:57 · 10 answers · asked by Mezmarelda 6

....

2007-12-06 12:28:18 · 16 answers · asked by The prophet of DOOM 5

Her popularity rating is in the 80% range too...not disliked and distrusted by 50% of the American population.

2007-12-06 12:27:33 · 15 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

And is that good for the rest of the worlds security?

2007-12-06 12:24:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why do people believe that violent crime is worse than ever when in fact the rate is near a 30-year low?

Why do they worry about terrorism when they are more likely to die from lightening strikes?

Why do the mass-media spoon-feed horrific tales of violence to their audiences?

Why do we seldom hear about traffic fatalities though they claim about fifty THOUSAND Americans' lives annually?

Why do people complain when they have to obey a speeding law but never flinch when their basic civil rights are infringed?

Why am I ranting?

What's the use?

2007-12-06 12:04:59 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Al Queda for sure.
Ahmidinijad.

continue the list.....

2007-12-06 12:01:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

targets in Iraq. They are joined by British Forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors, I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."
What was the occasion?



William Jefferson Clinton

The occasion was the night before the House of Representatives was to vote on his impeachment.

Isn't this very reminiscent of his attacking an aspirin factory in Sudan to get the press off of the news story that he had forcibly raped Juanita Broaddrick, a fellow Democrat candidate?

2007-12-06 11:58:21 · 6 answers · asked by plezurgui 6

Okay, yeah I know we mention him at every chance, but have you ever wondered why we fight so hard for him.

We want this war to end
We want peace
We want to have our rights
We want to protect the constitution

why do you hate a group that fights so hard for these reason

2007-12-06 11:54:36 · 11 answers · asked by spikesdummy 1

When and how did you decide on supporting your current affiliation (including Independents)? This is assuming that you chose a side that's not what your parents tried to raise you as.

2007-12-06 11:45:31 · 26 answers · asked by Opal 6

I hate the UN.

2007-12-06 11:35:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-06 11:19:41 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-06 11:09:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

BEIJING — The medicine cabinet in the average U.S. home is filling with drugs made in China , and some experts say that could be a prescription for trouble.

Personally I don't even take aspirins.

What say you?

2007-12-06 11:08:04 · 17 answers · asked by Bubba 6

She supports given driver license and social security to illegal immigrants which can put the citizens in america at risk considering middle eastern people would be included in that. She also supports socialism and the fact of letting your government take care of you.

2007-12-06 11:06:04 · 17 answers · asked by Scott 1

Executive Order: Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government on Monday, December 24, 2007

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

2007-12-06 11:03:03 · 7 answers · asked by Bubba 6

The government shouldn't have the authority to dictate your health care, and especially that of your children... what if your child is sick, do you really think that it is fair that they wait for a week, just to be checked by a doctor? If you have a family, it should be your responsibility to provide care, or you should have waited until financially secure to have children...

2007-12-06 11:01:48 · 24 answers · asked by Luke Was Here 6

how would you run your campaign? would you be a suck-up republican and say that the country has been run just fine for the past eight years? or would you jump on board with 70% of america, admit that bush is a failure, and that this country needs serious overhaul?

2007-12-06 10:52:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Deism is a belief that God created the universe and its laws (including the natural law) and simply has left it be and does not actively intervene in the world. Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, was a Deist, as were most educated people of that time period.

We can see the Deist influence of the founders when they referred to the "Creator" instead of "God" and when they referred to inalienable rights such as the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (the pursuit of happiness meant property, but Jefferson preferred that phrase, which has led to misinterpretations; this was the classical liberal understanding of natural law).

Why is it that people spread myths about the religious beliefs of the founders for what appear to be politically motivated reasons?

2007-12-06 10:50:51 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

What say you?

2007-12-06 10:45:49 · 12 answers · asked by Bubba 6

Can you discuss a political issues brought up in the movie Fahrenheit 9/11.

2007-12-06 10:45:19 · 7 answers · asked by ira s 1

"Then as now, liberals protect themselves from detection with wild calumnies against anybody who opposes them. They have no interest in -- or aptitude for -- persuasion. Their goal is to anathematize their enemies."
- Ann Coulter: 11/7/07
http://anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=219

Try not to prove her point as you answer. Use a dictionary if necessary.

2007-12-06 10:41:02 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-06 10:39:06 · 10 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

2007-12-06 10:28:32 · 21 answers · asked by R J 7

This question was one of such rhetorical responses to one of my questions. People complain that we have coruption in government but then people say what does the Bible have to do with one's moral stance? Can't we use the Bible to measure peoples moral values? Should not our leaders be educated in ethical values from some body of literature on the subject, or some particular philosphy of such? And if the Bible does not have to do with any one's moral philosophy in our government, what moral systems should I expect to find among them? (the teachings of Lao Tzu perhaps?). And some have pointed out that being Christian is not a necessary qualification for being in public office; I never said it was. But the point is being moral is a qualification. And so what value system should we measure our leaders by? If you see the responses to my last two questions you will understand my alarm in this question. Thank you for considering this important general issue.

2007-12-06 10:27:02 · 11 answers · asked by David L 4

you know what is happening? I don't know the psychological word for it, but there has got to be a word for when you start at point A and the people would never go along with or accept something, but you slowly but surely over time (say 7 years later) subltly get them to accept things so far different from what they would have accepted at the beginning of the seven years. So that 7 years later news comes out about that this was done and that was done, and people just shrug their shoulers and resign themselves,whereas 7 years earlier they would have been up in arms.

its time folks, if we dont impeach these bozos, our country will have set the precedent for someone worst to come along in the future. Think about it, we really have not really faced a major crisis. Can you imagine what they could if we really do?


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071206/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/cia_videotapes

2007-12-06 10:25:09 · 16 answers · asked by ron j 1

2007-12-06 10:20:00 · 11 answers · asked by realitycheck 3

Please don't laugh.

2007-12-06 10:16:41 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush accidentally gave out the wrong number Tuesday.

WASHINGTON (CNN) — Harried homeowners seeking mortgage relief from a new Bush administration hotline Thursday had to contend with a bit of temporary misdirection from the president himself.

As he announced his plan to ease the mortgage crisis for consumers, President Bush accidentally gave out the wrong phone number for the new “Hope Now Hotline” set up by his administration.

Anyone who dialed 1-800-995-HOPE did not reach the mortgage hotline but instead contacted the Freedom Christian Academy — a Texas-based group that provides Christian education home schooling material.

The White House press office quickly put out a correction moments after the President’s remarks. After dialing the correct number, 1-888-995-HOPE, CNN was connected to a “counselor” within three minutes.

minutes.http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/

The chimp is beyond embarrassing at this point.

2007-12-06 10:11:27 · 20 answers · asked by spillmind 4