English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And is that good for the rest of the worlds security?

2007-12-06 12:24:26 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Of course it is Clintons fault. :LOL

2007-12-06 12:37:18 · update #1

9 answers

Hey Rube.............

1. It is not Bush's war. The war against terror is our war and for our good.

2. It has not increased the numbers of the terrorists but rather exposed the numbers that exist and actually grew under the Clinton presidency.

.

2007-12-06 12:34:14 · answer #1 · answered by Gerry G 7 · 1 2

Right from the start in the juxtrapositioning of GOD and Iraq ,Bush made it very clear that he believes God directed him to war against Iraq.

Couple this with that US general who publically vilified and demonized Islam and further link this to the overall crapping on Islam throughout the US and this has been enough to enrage even the most moderate Muslims arounds the war for it was and IS clear that Bush's crime against humanity in Iraq is as much about OIL as it is about a fanatic,zealotous fundy Bush to serve his God and destroy Islam .

All of this have driven literally thousands into the arms of Al qaeda and swelled their membership.

Bush's Iraqi atrocity forced the US military to effectively abandoned the real terrorist fight in Afghanistan and today the Taliban/Al qaeda have virtually taken back Afghanistan .

While the monumentally immoral American public boasts about the fact that the US has not had a terrorist attack since 9/11, this revitalized stronger al qaeda have slaughtered humans in Spain,Britain,Bali etc ALL THANKS TO BUSH AND HIS VILE EVIL ACTIONS THAT HAVE GROWN AL QAEDA

As they have demonstated here and in so many other situations,Americans do not give a damn about other humans or what happens to them because of American actions .All these other SLAUGHTERED HUMAN BEINGS ARE REFERRED TO AS NOTHING BUT "COLATERAL DAMAGE" ,a vile /filthy de-humanizing phrase coined by the slaughtering US military in Vietnam .




http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0925/dailyUpdate.html

2007-12-07 18:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Those who oppose Bush like to say that al queda's numbers have increased. It would be interesting to get a census on them prior to 9/11 and then one now. Maybe we can arrange a census taker to include Osama Bin Laden and his body guards this time and knock on the right cave.

2007-12-06 20:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by netjr 6 · 0 0

If I were Al-Q, I'd have a life size poster of Bush in an Uncle Sam uniform with the caption "Uncle Sam Hates You"

In the background would be bombed out buildings in Iraq and an image of a Blackwater agent randomly shooting at unarmed people.

2007-12-06 20:45:43 · answer #4 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 1 1

And the alternative is to not respond to the 9/11 attacks? As far as "Bush's War" against Iraq was concerned, that had to do with Saddam's failure to abide by the treaty he had signed to end Gulf War I, and not al-Qaeda.

2007-12-06 20:30:50 · answer #5 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 1 2

The numbers have not increased, they have just been funneled into the region, which actually makes them easier to kill. The world is more secure not less, because of it.

2007-12-06 21:01:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

because we focused on Iraq... and not on al-queda leadership...

so, now they have an excellent recruitment tool, and still have most of their leadership intact...

2007-12-06 20:33:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

no body knows, maybe they decrease.

2007-12-08 05:46:11 · answer #8 · answered by Taha* 7 · 0 0

yeah
good point

2007-12-06 20:27:28 · answer #9 · answered by Military Supporter! 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers