Politics - 22 August 2006

Terror : Extreme fear; fear that agitates body and mind; violent dread; fright. So who is more freightened by the others? Pls do not treat every Muslim as a terrorist. There are also bad Christians and little Jews!

2006-08-22 19:21:02 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-22 19:15:33 · 16 answers · asked by one 4

2006-08-22 19:09:16 · 18 answers · asked by dane p 2

How many of you VOTED for Bush and REGRET IT.

I am only looking for answers from people who VOTED FOR BUSH and REGRET IT.
Anyone else who didn't vote for him, or did ote for him and don't regret it can keep on walking cause I'm not considering your answers at all.

for those of you who voted for him and REGRET IT...Why did you vote for him and WHY do you regret it.

2006-08-22 18:35:55 · 13 answers · asked by neoconbush 1

I think it's hypocrytical for christians to be the aggressor in any situation
They have the right to defend and use force
The question is who is the aggressor - in any conflict
The people or countries who wage war are only interested in accumulating and or protecting their wealth and power
The bible says: What will it profit a man if he gains the whole world yet suffers the loss of his soul

2006-08-22 18:24:36 · 25 answers · asked by vincegill 3

Worlds Most Hated your virgins await.

Bin Laden
Ayman Al-Zawahiri
Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed Al-Nasser
Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah
Muhsin Musa Matwalli Atwah
Ali Atwa
Anas Al-Liby
Fazul Abdullah Mohammed
Hasan Izz-Al-Din
Ahmed Mohammed Hamed Ali
Imad Fayez Mugniyah
Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan
Abdul Rahman Yasin
Fahid Mohammed Ally Msalam
Ahmad Ibrahim Al-Mughassil
Ali Saed Bin Ali El-Hoorie
Saif Al-Adel
Ibrahim Salih Mohammed Al-Yacoub
Ramadan Abdullah Mohammad Shallah
Abd Al Aziz Awda
Khadafi Abubakar Janjalani
Isnilon Totoni Hapilon
Jainal Antel Sali, Jr.
Mohammed Ali Hamadei
Jamel Ahmed Mohammed Ali Al-Badawi
Jaber A. Elbaneh
Ahmadinejad
Kim Il-sung
Hugo Chávez
Khaled Mashaal
Ali Khamenei
Hassan Nasrallah
Bashar al-Assad
Jamil Ahmed Badawi
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed
Saif Al-Adil
Shaikh Saiid Al-Sharif
Tawfiq Attash Khallad
Saad bin Laden
Abu Mohammad Al-Masri
Abu Hafs The Mauritanian
Sulaiman Abu Ghaith
Midhat Mursi
Mohammed Jamal Khalifa
Ahmad Said Al-Kadr
Zaid Khayr
Abu Basir Al-Yemeni

2006-08-22 18:18:33 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

A cancerous lesion was removed from Impeached President Clinton's back. He'll be okay. Doctors say it was caused by exposure.
Which begs the question: then why was the legion on his back???

Impeached President Clinton claims that the Republicans tried to stop the voting in Florida. Perhaps he's confusing that why when he used FBI folders to stop the voting in his own impeachment trial.

2006-08-22 18:16:19 · 12 answers · asked by Heroic Liberal 1

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions"

2006-08-22 18:05:53 · 18 answers · asked by abascious 1

it is a terror state:

http://www.ifamericansknew.org

so why?

2006-08-22 18:04:23 · 15 answers · asked by David F 2

2006-08-22 17:55:42 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

and iran said that it will use it in peace

2006-08-22 17:54:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

There are about 400 recognized terrorist groups in the world. Over 90 percent of these are Islamist groups. Over 90 percent of the current world fighting involves Islamist terror movements. The vast majority of world terrorism is religiously motivated by Islam. This involves terrorist acts in 26 countries worldwide. These people cannot be reasoned with. Their hatred is an anathema to all rational consideration. They have but one goal: to subdue the world under the rule of Islam.

And the rest of the "good" muslims sit silently in agreement, filling the coffers of the martyr charities that pay families for their murdering gifts to the world.

Sorry muslim apologists, the proverbial veil is off, and there is nothing you can say or do short of finally going through a reformation and/or enlightment (even if it is 400 years late) that is going to convince us otherwise.

Your ad hominem attacks that I am hate filled or a bigot don't intimidate me. I'm not theone killing innocents.

2006-08-22 17:37:05 · 37 answers · asked by Anonymous

And speaks only to Iran, which says it does not possess nuclear weapons and does not want only wants nuclear power

2006-08-22 17:36:11 · 15 answers · asked by why? 2

I do...

2006-08-22 17:32:21 · 17 answers · asked by Bob S 1

Mean is good and good is ..evil .

2006-08-22 17:30:39 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Oh yeah i remember, George W. Bush, not John Kerry... please forgive my forgetfulness.

2006-08-22 17:30:32 · 14 answers · asked by Bob S 1

Why? Because neocons give America what they call 'rational irrationality'. This is the kind of benefit of the doubt you give to someone who looks a little crazy. You might step aside and let them pass because you just never know what they might do.

This policy is what caused Libya to reform after years of being a pain in the butt. They were concerned that Bush just might 'do it'.

Sure neocons are blamed for failed wars in Afghanistan and Iraq but would anyone really let Afghanistan go unpunished after 9/11?...and who knows what Iraq had cooking...remember all those UN nuclear inspectors who were refused access to facilities? If everything was on the up and up, why didn't Saddam permit the inspections? In 1990, Saddam hid his air force in Iran. There are reports that this time around he hid his WMDs in Syria.

Lastly, what is the alternative to striking Iran? An Iran with nukes?...led by a guy so Anti-American?

So thank a neocon for keeping you safe.

2006-08-22 17:28:37 · 14 answers · asked by Brand X 6

should suicide be legalized only for women??? why not?? to earn 10 points, answer must incude the phrase, "I LIKE B-O-L-O-G-N-A!"

2006-08-22 17:17:03 · 11 answers · asked by mr.bill 3

If not, what can we do about it?

2006-08-22 17:15:46 · 11 answers · asked by Brand X 6

Or maybe they are all just too ignorant to recognize that they suck....

2006-08-22 17:13:59 · 15 answers · asked by Bob S 1

i know some of you have a short memory so let me remind you of a few things in case you've forgotten. http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5150 http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/5/30/84934.shtml http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/swirsky/03132006.htm http://prorev.com/legacy.htm

2006-08-22 17:05:06 · 11 answers · asked by onefatwhiteguy 2

Why?

2006-08-22 17:03:33 · 14 answers · asked by sexyAsh 1

Amnesty International has said that there is evidence that Israel's attacks on civilian infrastructure during the recent war in Lebanon constitute war crimes.


The London-based organisation said that the unlawful destruction of homes, bridges and roads as well as water and fuel storage plants, was a key part of Israel's strategy in Lebanon, in a report issued on Wednesday morning.



"Israel's assertion that the attacks on the infrastructure were lawful is manifestly wrong. Many of the violations identified in our report are war crimes, including indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks," Kate Gilmore, executive deputy secretary-general of Amnesty International

2006-08-22 16:53:55 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok, before anyone calls me crazy hear my story. I was serving in the Army from1999-2003, in 2002 we were in New York to reinlist at ground zero, and to train West Point cadets. One of my sergeants says his wife saw on CNN that the U.S was sending war ships to the middle east in the beggining of an invasion. That night my platoon and I went to a nightclub in New York, and I got so drunk that I leaked info about the invasion. The next day someone threw me a New York newspaper that said "Leak of Iraq Invasion Causes Stock Market to Crash"..........If this was true we didn't invade until 2003, meaning Saddam could have hid his WMD in plenty of time from 2002-2003. I have had death threats and everything else, anyone else think it's true?

2006-08-22 16:48:04 · 9 answers · asked by lvillejj 4

2006-08-22 16:45:24 · 3 answers · asked by MacRibbit 1

He said(in effect) "I cannot take credit for this attack,but praise those that did"If he did it ,like Bush insists he did,Why wouldn't he, (Osama)take credit for it?If fourteen of the sixteen highjackers were from Saudi Arabia,Why are we (still) at war in Afganastan and Iraq?The
Bin Laden family leases heavy machinery throughout the middle east.Is there any financial or contractual history between the Bin
Laden and Bush oil interests prior to 911?Did anyone in the white house obstruct efforts by U.S. intelligents agencies to apprehend Osama Bin Laden prior to 911?Is anyone informed enough to recall the facts?The real question here is" what would make terrorists so mad as to fly airliners into buildings?"I know its NOT
because they hate our freedom as Bush says.It has much more to do with our blind support of Israel,and our troops in Mecca.

2006-08-22 16:44:25 · 8 answers · asked by Mark K 6

there haven't been any Republicans suggesting that Bush invaded Iraq for any reason other than freedom, have there?

2006-08-22 16:33:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush has stated two days ago, and I do believe correctly, that neither he or his administration ever said there was a direct link to 9/11 and Sadaam Hussein.

Political spin at its finest. They know what they did...

2006-08-22 16:29:51 · 21 answers · asked by Bistro 7

2006-08-22 16:26:10 · 13 answers · asked by SPEAK UP WAKE UP 2

2006-08-22 16:24:14 · 19 answers · asked by alex v 1