Do you think in such an environment that the 'best' answers really get chosen? What do you think of the risks that heavy users can use the time they have to weight the material on answers according to their outlook and prejudices?
There has been a study on web participation that summarises, "In most online communities, 90% of users are lurkers who never contribute, 9% of users contribute a little, and 1% of users account for almost all the action."
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html
With the internet as part of the future for more civic participation and direct democracy, what do you think are the risks?
i.e. are we at risk of having our attentions and energies directed by a small and inappropriate coterie of people? And if so, how is that different from now?
2007-01-31
02:48:30
·
19 answers
·
asked by
RonanJ
1