English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

That is why the republicans need to come up with someone good so that Hillary never has a chance.

2007-01-31 02:12:03 · answer #1 · answered by Tink 5 · 1 0

LAST August, a federal judge found that the president of the United States broke the law, committed a serious felony and violated the Constitution. Had the president been an ordinary citizen — someone charged with bank robbery or income tax evasion — the wheels of justice would have immediately begun to turn. The F.B.I. would have conducted an investigation, a United States attorney’s office would have impaneled a grand jury and charges would have been brought.

But under the Bush Justice Department, no F.B.I. agents were ever dispatched to padlock White House files or knock on doors and no federal prosecutors ever opened a case.

2007-01-31 03:44:12 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Nope no doubts here. It's about money and power. Not person. Hillary will raise $500 million easy. A Clinton/Edwards win will give Democrats 8 years in control of the White House. They will need far longer than that to repair all the harm done to America by the republicans.

2007-01-31 02:11:37 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0 1

You seriously think Hillary will make it to the White House. She took akll she had to last visit.
There should be no more Bush or Clinton's to ever see the White House again.

2007-01-31 02:06:30 · answer #4 · answered by Arizona Brit 4 · 1 0

You look to have a warped experience of what "humanity" is. the position were you at the same time as Saddam grow to be dumping people into shredders and into mass graves ? Or at the same time as he invaded Kuwait (which lost his u . s . a . its soverienty) the position were you at the same time as there have been ethnic killings in Ruwanda ? 6 million people were killed on account that 2000 contained in the Congo republic via machette for the most area. possibly you opt on to the contact upon the autrocities committed via the taliban ? or Mercy killings ? random acts of terrorism international huge, now to not indicate terror helping international places with terror camps for education ? so that you would whine antagonistic to the perfect status u . s . a . leaders which have tried to save the peace antagonistic to sheer evil contained in the international for...????? your left wing stupidity regarding whom you imagine the guidelines of humanity ought to practice and overlook about something else of the international ? Your outrageous and should be shot to steer away from the prospect of breeding

2016-12-03 06:52:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you can bet it is owned , who has control of our monetary system,? who has control of our news media ? who has the richest and biggest lobby in Washington? who actually controls our propaganda machine and elects our candidates in every election? when the bad things about a candidate is suppressed and the other is built up how can any one say it is even a election, also, if they want some one to win all they need to do is put some one to oppose them that no one would vote for, that is why we need a different system in our country and a better selection of candidates, as it is now there is no such thing as a contest,as one organization runs and controls every thing I mentioned , the Zionist

2007-01-31 02:15:19 · answer #6 · answered by james w 3 · 0 0

I don't think it's owned, but the Clintons and the Bushs certainly do hold sway over American politics. It's not much different than the Kennedys which have a large political family.

2007-01-31 02:04:34 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2 2

Very Limited options indeed

2007-01-31 02:10:22 · answer #8 · answered by pilotB 3 · 1 0

What happened to the Americans? are you now adopting monopolize government? better to accept monopoly type of government?

2007-01-31 02:07:30 · answer #9 · answered by aRnObIe 4 · 1 0

Yes - it is and that's why we have to say no to Hillary - we need new blood in the white house - not more of the old

2007-01-31 02:02:28 · answer #10 · answered by lifesajoy 5 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers