Other - Politics & Government - August 2006

I know, I know..........

Your only supposed to ask stupid questions about Israeli's and Americans here.........

But I never liked being a Follower...................

2006-08-15 18:07:38 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-15 18:02:52 · 9 answers · asked by NONAME 1

2006-08-15 18:00:50 · 14 answers · asked by bacheeku 1

I want to send a letter to my friends in Jamaica, with one problem. How many stamps do I need to put on the envelope to be able to send it to Jamaica?!

2006-08-15 17:51:52 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Margaret Sanger hated black people and other minorities. She created Planned Parenthood to control the number of minorities born, since it was obviously illegal to kill them outright.
Liberals and the pro-abortion movement fail to mention this little fact. Why?

http://blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a7dd3740515.htm
http://www.eadshome.com/MargaretSanger.htm
to name a very few!

2006-08-15 17:48:28 · 16 answers · asked by LastNerveLost 3

I dont want to hear what you want to happen. What do the polls, political anylist, ... etc... say.

2006-08-15 17:22:13 · 4 answers · asked by lend322 4

2006-08-15 17:04:13 · 11 answers · asked by virender g 1

2006-08-15 16:57:06 · 9 answers · asked by ? 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726

there is the link, help spread awareness.

2006-08-15 16:53:52 · 6 answers · asked by Metacoma 3

An' he's a "flip plopper!" An' he has a rich, ugly, foreign wife who has a tude! An' he looks French! An' he's BORING!!!

2006-08-15 16:45:14 · 14 answers · asked by ? 3

2006-08-15 16:39:09 · 14 answers · asked by idono 2

2006-08-15 16:35:29 · 6 answers · asked by ? 3

2006-08-15 16:32:42 · 17 answers · asked by Emily 3

what better way to conform the masses...scare Americans and relinquish any power needed to "protect us"...becoming more and more a Facist Governing body?

2006-08-15 16:25:27 · 14 answers · asked by Start_A_Revolution 3

1.Would create sever damage to the US economy
2.China is exempt from the protocol ( they are the second largest emitter)
2.India is also exempt (another large emitter)
3.Gives every other country an economic advantage while reducing the US’s.
4.Harmful to industrial growth of democratic countries. i.e. the United States

Basically, the treaty works in such a way that it harms the United States and has little to no effect on the rest of the world. Essentially, the EU wants to bring the US down to its level of productivity. They are unable to keep up with the United States in terms of; agriculture, industrialization, productivity, research, and just about everything else. So…Rather than learning to play the game, the EU wants to reduce our potency on the playing field…It’s kind of like telling Michel Johnson to stop running so fast because “we can’t keep up”…We Americans are not as stupid as you would like to think we are… We just play the game better..

2006-08-15 16:19:09 · 11 answers · asked by quarterback 2

2006-08-15 16:15:50 · 6 answers · asked by rainynghts_71 2

2006-08-15 16:12:14 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-15 16:01:05 · 23 answers · asked by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1

I am confident he will be. History will prove him to be a man of great integrity and outstanding courage and fortitude.

2006-08-15 16:00:37 · 14 answers · asked by LastNerveLost 3

2006-08-15 15:57:03 · 10 answers · asked by Slap Happy 3

2006-08-15 15:56:14 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

For me the best ridiculous lie I've heard from the neocon administration is that Iraq had WMD. But, we all heard that one.

The second best is when you watch those idiots Rumsfeld and Cheyney explaining how CASH STRAPPED, Saddam Hussein was able to develop mobile bio warfare trucks - that BTW - were never found when we invaded the country.

When I mention this to people I argue with, they immediately say "SADDAM SHIPPED THEM TO IRAN or SYRIA".

YEAH SURE - right past US spy satellites. HAHAH

Neocons can come up with some pretty hilarious BS to draw fire away from Bush and their own lack of intelligence.

What is the funniest, ridiculous neocon story you've heard?

2006-08-15 15:54:13 · 22 answers · asked by ? 1

2006-08-15 15:53:24 · 10 answers · asked by idono 2

2006-08-15 15:53:23 · 16 answers · asked by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1

2006-08-15 15:52:11 · 1 answers · asked by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1

2006-08-15 15:51:34 · 11 answers · asked by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1

2006-08-15 15:50:46 · 10 answers · asked by Repubs_have_no_balls_or_brains 1

I was watching the dictators of Iran and Syria and leaders of Hezbollah showing claims and videos of their version of the war. Here is the other side seeing it through the Jewish...View... http://www.aish.com/movies/Lebanon.asp

2006-08-15 15:50:19 · 5 answers · asked by ionsouljah 1

So here is my question. Modern cars are powered by gasoline. A small percentage of cars are flex fuel, hybrids, ect., but the vast majority still run off of good old gas.

Now, we have proof that the world is running out of oil, and that america is overwhelmingly dependent on foreign sources of the crude oil that makes gasoline.

Why is it, then, that we are so stubborn to change? Why haven't auto giants such as GM, Ford, or Honda designed electric cars, or more flex fuel cars or more diesel cars, even? The sad thing is, they did. the GM EV1 electric car. The Ford Reflex Hybrid concept. the Honda Insight. Of those three, only the GM and the Honda ever saw production, and only the Honda still exists. the EV1, was taken back by GM and destroyed. the ford reflex never made it out of concept. the insight production was halted.

we know the oil, gas, and car giants have the resources to end america's dependency on oil and gas.

the question is, why dont they?

2006-08-15 15:48:47 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is it true that a conservative is the west end of an east bound horse?

2006-08-15 15:35:58 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous