English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 5 October 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

My husband and I have been married six years, and I want to file an I-130 for him. Currently, we live outside of the US, but do plan on moving back there once he is able to get his Green Card.

We have an immigration lawyer, and he told us that if we file the petition with the USCIS then the process is easier but takes a longer period of time. He that by going through the US Embassy here where we live, the process is harder (they require original documents as opposed to copies, there are more interviews, etc), but that the completion time is shorter - sometimes half the time it would be if you apply with USCIS directly. He said in the end it is our decision where we want to file.

I am just curious as to what other people's experiences are with filing with the USCIS vs. US Embassies. Is one really faster than the other?

2007-10-05 00:11:58 · 1 answers · asked by τυηιsιαη βεΙΙε 7 in Immigration

hello my husband is suppose to go to Korea, but because he has $6000 in debt they are holding him as a held over in A.I.T.
Do anybody know what should he do. Well so far he set up an allotment with careone debt consolidatation. Once he show the people in S1 that he has a debt consolidator, Do you think they would let him leave then?

2007-10-05 00:11:40 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

If you're really after "truth" why not read this nice piece? It was among Yahoo's atrticles, but I don't think you'd ever notice it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucru/20071003/cm_ucru/quotwedontspeaktoevilquot

2007-10-05 00:11:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2007-10-05 00:11:22 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Military

Who has the right to own the land?
30 years ago my friends uncle used to bougth small land for over 250sq meter and accdg to its lot the 30 sq.meter was donated to be used as a deep well under local citizens of the town but then again the deep well is no longer existing and the new owner of the land who was the uncle of my friend is sitll paying for the tax of the land including the donated one, is it possible or do the owner has the right to take the donated land which is no longer existing or not properly used by its purpose, the reason that the owner wants to get the piece of land is because one of their neigbhorhood is putting a lot of garbage trash and human and animal waste in donated property which was being taxed by the owner...

2007-10-05 00:10:56 · 6 answers · asked by Kapre2ko 1 in Law & Ethics

Once again the Americans stick their foot up their own a*ss
Greedy record companies, Rehabiing and Stupid Pop Whores, have once again shown just how to make the world think of Americans as nothing more than bleeping Idiots, Now why would you force someone to pay 9000 dollars per song, (most likely some pop garbage), in fines. All the things record companies and popstars should be doing to promote peace and love around the world, instead they are sticking out their asses in crappy music videos, and driving around drunk or loaded and making bad sex tapes, and living in souless manisions, Are the record companies and so-called musicians so out of touch that they cannot see this judgement will only make people download illegally on an even broader and more clever scale. And what About Asia" , they are pirating and copying music, movies etc on such a grand scale that the record companies and movie makers have no profit at all in this part of the world. Know your enemy?

2007-10-05 00:07:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

fedest.com, questions and answers