English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics & Government - 17 March 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government

Civic Participation · Elections · Embassies & Consulates · Government · Immigration · International Organizations · Law & Ethics · Law Enforcement & Police · Military · Other - Politics & Government · Politics

2007-03-17 00:14:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

I am embarrassed by the man. Now, too late, he's visiting heads of state abroad, and the way in which he is being received is terrible. I'm afraid he will start a war somewhere else. It's a shame that the rest of the world thinks we're warmongers! Please share your thoughts calmly. Thank you.

2007-03-17 00:09:00 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

Yesterday I posted the following question here:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AoUI28j4xg7yo3tl2kLQ6Xjsy6IX?qid=20070315055533AAOxZpK

In all but a few answers from Republicans you hear the same flawed utopic self-reliance jumble that prays opportunity is out there for everyone- Republicans are the hard working market-minded ones and that Democrat voters are just the lazy spoiled people looking to benefit from the welfare.So my question would be,why do YOU republicans assume that all people currently enrolled on welfare are liberals? If it was mandatory to ask what party someone belongs to when enrolling for goverment assistance, wouldnt numbers be torn between repubs and dems? Data for 2004 presidential ellections shows that Kerry raked in 56% of votes from people who held *post-graduate*education, while bush only raked in about 44%.So I ask, did that majority of lazy "Commies"as you republicans like to dub got that far ahead in life by sucking on welfare?

2007-03-17 00:07:00 · 7 answers · asked by Gus 3 in Other - Politics & Government

fedest.com, questions and answers