Forget the Kyoto Treaty, Al Gore's film, even all the UN or George Bush conspiracy theories for a moment. I just want to understand why some seem adamantly opposed to the idea of global warming in its entirety.
For those who oppose global warming theories; I'd like to know wheter you feel it's not at all possible (or even likely) that man is having any tangible, damaging effect on the environment? Or is the real debate more around "to what extent" and whether or not it's economically worth the cost of doing something differently?
2006-07-13
09:24:17
·
4 answers
·
asked by
travelerNY
2