http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070921/ap_on_fe_st/odd_rhyming_judge;_ylt=Ao9d.t5WAlZ139vK.o.s93guQE4F
A federal judge was driven to rhyme after receiving a hard-boiled egg in the mail from a prison inmate protesting his diet.
Wolff asked the judge to issue a preliminary injunction that would force prison officials to serve him meals that meet "both his spiritual and medical needs."
Wolff is serving 10 to 20 years for sexually assaulting a 7-year-old girl. His lawsuit was filed in August 2006 and is scheduled for trial in June 2008.
I think the article was focused on the "cute" little rhyme that the judge made up, but how about the little 7 year old girl that was sexually assulted.
Why should a person that assulted a child be given the choice of food he gets?
He didn't give her a choice?
And saying that he can only eat certain foods because it is his religion...
Did he not go against his religion when he sexually assulted a 7 year old?
2007-09-22
04:01:44
·
5 answers
·
asked by
mjennings_cot
3