Global Warming

2007-05-18 07:20:20 · 9 answers · asked by Marc B 1

Saturation is the equilibrium state. I would expect things to normally be in equilibrium. So why is it suddenly big news that the ocean is saturated with CO2?

2007-05-18 07:06:59 · 7 answers · asked by Ray Eston Smith Jr 6

I have no problem agreeing with scientists that global warming is happening. What I would like to see is a cogent answer to this question: If we humans are causing global warming, why are the other planets in our solar system also having an increase in their surface temperatures?

The Martian icecaps are melting! If that is not the fault of humans (I am pretty sure it isn't), then does it not logically follow that the sun is the culprit? If the sun is warming up all other planets in the solar system, wouldn't it be warming up earth as well?

Again, I believe the earth is getting warmer. But please, somebody explain to me how it is man's fault when Mars is warming as well. I really do want to know.

2007-05-18 06:37:51 · 15 answers · asked by Kevin C 4

DRAGON 2008
"I BELIEVE IN U.S."

2007-05-18 04:24:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Man has subjected his inviorment to a enormus burden, how in your opinion will we be able to fix it?

2007-05-18 04:03:19 · 27 answers · asked by Lady 5

Albert Einstien said,"When the bees die,humans have only 4 years to survive !"

2007-05-18 03:25:11 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need facts not opinions no political views

2007-05-18 02:51:36 · 14 answers · asked by DBBaller 2

I wrote an answer and found immediately a thumbs down to it. It is impossible to have read my answer so quickly. Then after reading through many answers discovered all thumbs up ratings were given to people who think Global Warming is a Myth and not true, while people who say it is a problem are given the thumbs down. What is this? I have lost confidence in the real legitimacy of this forum. It is a put on.... You know where you can put this forum.. Answers....right up your Yahoo.

2007-05-18 01:50:44 · 18 answers · asked by djermano 1

Everything I have read, all the reports have "maybe", "could be" "perhaps" "possibly caused by" . IMHO I think it is just a natural change the Earth is going thru, man may hurt a bit, but not that much. Sounds like scientists looking for funding til they retire to me.

2007-05-18 00:58:47 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

Glacier ice is deep blue because the intense pressure on the ice changes the properties of water. Even the melt water from the glacier is a strange blue color. Do you think maybe the pressure might affect CO2? Also, since we know that things like bacteria, spiders, and ice worms live in glaciers, wouldn't they affect the gasses in the ice based on their respiration?

2007-05-17 21:02:42 · 6 answers · asked by smartr-n-u 6

because some people say we can just slow it down, does that mean we cant stop it forever?

2007-05-17 18:59:08 · 15 answers · asked by Brian N 2

2007-05-17 18:50:33 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

We will all be sweating a lot more, right? Does anyone have any inside information on Speedstick? What is the best deodorant for people without a lot of armpit hair?

2007-05-17 17:28:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

for a project i want it today so please help me

2007-05-17 17:21:46 · 14 answers · asked by nischita j 1

if so, then you believe that human beings evolution began billions of years ago.(at the very least millions)
ok, over this expansive amount of time the earth has gone through much more strenuous climate change than we r experiencing and predicting for the future. this can not be disputed with any intellectual responsibility or integrity. even the worst case scenarios predicted by science today can not compare to what the earth has experienced over the course of human evolution.
yet, we, the earth and the human race, r all still here.
through all of it, the human species has proven to b just as resilient as it's earth mother.

2007-05-17 16:52:44 · 10 answers · asked by tex 1

the earth is incredibly resilient!
case in point; we r told that the earth experienced a collision with an asteroid however many millions of years ago. the environment on earth was so damaged that the dinosaurs were wiped out completely. this is an accepted account of history.
now, we r told that our very existence is a stake over global warming.
when did the earth cease to b the beautifully resilient planet it has always been for millions of years, and become so fragile that people generally accept the fate of the very earth is at stake over "global warming"?

2007-05-17 16:21:28 · 7 answers · asked by tex 1

The term "Global Warming" means warming in every region around the world. Otherwise it is considered "regional" warming which happens naturally...some areas get hotter as some areas cool. Given that, why is the Antarctic Ice Sheet expanding in a period of Global Warming?

Please review below:
http://www.globalwarming.org/article.php?uid=192

2007-05-17 16:03:08 · 6 answers · asked by Wait a Minute 4

If Nostradamus prediciton is just a theory...not true, people still neglect it and don't prevent it from happening or prevent it from coming true. Human kind has forgotten to think about the nature and preffer to think more about themselves.

Many of his prediction did come true. What are we waiting for (last mintues and then blame god for all the things that we did 'cause we preffer to neglect all the being around us.) Lord created the nature not pollution point that and remember that.

Everything can be stop... {where they is a will; they is a way} the door is open but we just don't want to open that door cause it has only LOVE, PEACE, KINDNESS, etc.. all good but the road is difficult. so instead of taking the difficult road we too the easy road that is Dead End to all mankind.

2007-05-17 15:08:52 · 16 answers · asked by love_rescue 2

Whats your take on Global Warming? Greenhouse gasses, 10,000 year cycle, load of nothing?

2007-05-17 14:44:46 · 25 answers · asked by Garrett b 2

what mislead you to believe CO2 is changing the temperature right now? There have been greater amounts of CO2 during the earth's history than what is in the atmosphere currently. Also, within the last 20,000 years, there have been far faster increases in temperature than what we have now. And there were no SUV's back then. And the human population back then was far less than 50 million people (around the size of the population of England).

http://worldhistoryforusall.sdsu.edu/dev/images/Popn_Graph3.jpg

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170&q=great+global+warming+swindle&hl=en

2007-05-17 14:43:54 · 6 answers · asked by a bush family member 7

Why not transform all the trash being generated into raw material rather than using landfills at all? It would be a lot more profitable to do the job rather than waiting for 50 years for nature to do it.

2007-05-17 11:37:11 · 7 answers · asked by jim m 5

Biomass begins with plants and every other living thing is a part of the biomass so it seems logical plants are basic and everything else follows.

2007-05-17 11:32:24 · 9 answers · asked by jim m 5

Is it true that evergreen pine trees, when planted in a landfill, will acually remove the poisons from the garbage from the ground and help to purify the earth. I forget where i heard this.

2007-05-17 10:54:06 · 4 answers · asked by nckros191 2

2007-05-17 10:00:01 · 18 answers · asked by puma 1

2007-05-17 09:51:00 · 20 answers · asked by Lee Edward 1

How can they believe in global warming, when satellite monitoring can find no significant heat increase along with the increase in CO2 output? Also, it has been found that it was, at one point, hotter in the Dark Ages--when there was less CO2 output--than it is today?!

2007-05-17 09:20:42 · 23 answers · asked by Bethany M 1

I believe it's true

2007-05-17 09:20:07 · 20 answers · asked by alpha23 2

2007-05-17 08:34:17 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 07:48:31 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous

Photosynthesis is a reaction how plants produce Oxygen. Oxygen is what we breath. What I am wondering is given time are living things that breath oxygen (eg Humans, animals etc )consuming more than what is being produced. If so does that mean we will end up with restricted amounts of oxygen and so we are no longer able to live. Is this a worst threat to us than global warming.
Due to destruction of plants that produce oxygen are we not choking ourselves and eventually that might lead to our extinction.

2007-05-17 07:10:30 · 25 answers · asked by Andrew 2