Environment - July 2007

2007-07-12 04:51:50 · 2 answers · asked by stephendouglas81 1 in Global Warming

as long as they are not willing to implement the best way to stop our CO2 emissions?
Does anyone know the best way? This is a test.

2007-07-12 04:25:51 · 12 answers · asked by areallthenamestaken 4 in Global Warming

Very much as it didn't suit dinosaurs millions of years ago when they became extinct?

I am not sure we are so influential we can change environment amazingly over a period of a couple of 100 years of destruction........

2007-07-12 04:09:37 · 15 answers · asked by Saucy B 6 in Global Warming

The middle ages warm period had global temps of 5-8 degrees warmer than today and none of the dire prediction occured then, in fact the people thrived at that time and the problems happened upon the cooling with the mini ice age which lasted untill the middle of the 19th century why do people believe all the doom and gloom predictions put forth by gore? History shows those predictions to be groundless.

2007-07-12 03:16:11 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Global Warming

is global warming caused by human co2 emmissions?or is it just a cyclic position of our world??

2007-07-12 02:57:35 · 25 answers · asked by wallykins 1 in Global Warming

Gazpacho, why do I want this link?

http://www2b.abc.net.au/tmb/Client/Board.aspx?b=89

I am trying to work and avoid forums/ answering questions.

2007-07-12 02:48:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Global Warming

2007-07-12 02:38:52 · 5 answers · asked by prettyinpinkgurl 1 in Global Warming

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07193/801165-113.stm

if global warming continues, northeastern states will lose the brook trout, snow, snow-mobiling, sledding, skiing, snowboarding, ice-fishing, and all winter activities. I don't know about you, but I live for winter and want to do something. Do it for ourselves and our future generations.

2007-07-12 02:16:51 · 12 answers · asked by thinkGREEN 3 in Global Warming

2007-07-12 01:57:04 · 11 answers · asked by bollampalli a 2 in Global Warming

2007-07-12 01:52:18 · 12 answers · asked by the atomic penguin 2 in Global Warming

Saw this article:
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56623

Comments?

2007-07-12 01:28:58 · 6 answers · asked by Emperor Insania Says Bye! 5 in Other - Environment

is that how it works? this is going to be great!!!

2007-07-12 01:15:42 · 3 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2 in Other - Environment

i understand the fairness doctrine will effectively silence rush limbaugh, hannity and all the others who speak out against it..should we do this?

2007-07-12 00:39:52 · 19 answers · asked by federalistcapers 2 in Global Warming

2007-07-12 00:08:56 · 29 answers · asked by teacher 1 in Other - Environment

2007-07-11 22:10:45 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Global Warming

2007-07-11 21:40:14 · 2 answers · asked by acchu 1 in Alternative Fuel Vehicles

Plastic Bag usage is a big issue. Do you want to take action or let the Government charge lots more taxes as the Irish Government does? The only real way to do prevent more taxes and charges is to use hemp or cotton bags, use canvas rucksacks, shopping trolleys or not to use bags at all.

2007-07-11 21:05:33 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Environment

In the US it is equal to 3.8 litres.
In the UK it is equal to 4.5 litres.
Are you confused in your environment?

2007-07-11 20:03:18 · 3 answers · asked by fpx 1 in Other - Environment

2007-07-11 19:45:17 · 2 answers · asked by jobseeker 1 in Other - Environment

I want to find gas stations that have ethanol in there gas that are near where I live. Is there a site I can go to that will help me with this?

2007-07-11 18:51:07 · 7 answers · asked by dirtyblondetx2005 1 in Alternative Fuel Vehicles

I am a Republican who wants the best for the environment without restricting people from living "free." Renewable resources are great to use and renew. For instance, a private logging company purchases a large tract of land and decides to log it. Environmentalists try to block the logging because it ruins the local ecosystem. If they are not clear cutting and are replanting then why is it so bad to log? Someone help clarify. And please do not be rude.

2007-07-11 17:27:38 · 11 answers · asked by Jona 1 in Conservation

2007-07-11 17:00:30 · 20 answers · asked by rayhab 4 in Green Living

If want to take paper to a place to have the re-used where would I go to?? I know recycoling place, but where.

2007-07-11 15:25:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Conservation

2007-07-11 14:54:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Green Living

are they serious? I mean, c'mon how can they not believe in it?

2007-07-11 14:33:50 · 23 answers · asked by Juan R 1 in Global Warming

A CAFE standard is what Congress is considering increase. For example, the average car made by Ford must get 30 Miles per Gallon. Number was a wild guess.

2007-07-11 14:23:06 · 15 answers · asked by pauly51_2001 3 in Alternative Fuel Vehicles

Face it, California expects 22 million more people in 50 years. If that is an expected percentage worldwide it wont make a bit of difference if we do not use cars or other power sources. I can see a host of other issues happening on top of warming if people are the cause. The only way to stop this is by controlling population.

2007-07-11 14:02:08 · 18 answers · asked by Paul K 1 in Global Warming

Does that knowledge translate into activism, financial support, or volunteering? Does it get you into a voting booth? Basically, how do you use the information that you gather?

2007-07-11 13:57:12 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Environment

The scientific case for anthropogenic global warming is now well-established, as is the possibility of great danger to the entire Earth and the future of humankind. As a scientist, I consider this series of articles in New Scientist magazine to be a fair treatment:

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462

Despite the clear warning issued by the vast majority of climate scientists, there continue to be many skeptical voices on these pages. Clearly, the skeptical voices tap into many well-established conservative ideas: distrust of government, of collective international action, and of science. Yet the persistance, and illogical viciousness of the arguments seems out of proportion. I wonder, therefore, if there is some driving motivation. Cui bono? I suggest it is those who would most be harmed by the solution to global warming: the petrol states of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Venezuela, and Nigeria, with the complicity of the American petroleum industry.

2007-07-11 11:56:03 · 11 answers · asked by cosmo 7 in Global Warming

i.e every 10,000 yrs our climate goes through changes

2007-07-11 11:49:17 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Global Warming