I plan on transferring to one of these schools from a community college. My career goal lies in the field of Finance or Investment Banking, and I plan on pursuing MBA at top 10 Business Schools.
I know that overall, Berkeley is the most prestigious and well known school out of the three, but UCLA's BizEcon program (I like the idea of having economics and business combined together. That's like mastering theoretical-based studing and technical training at the same time) and USC's Business Admin. (Trojan network is unignorable plus USC's Undergrad. Biz Program is extremely strong) are also quite tempting.
If I were to choose either UCLA or USC, will I have significantly harder time getting a job at a top-player I-bank or Finance Firm than if I were to choose Berkeley?
While some people say the difference is negligible and the only difference is location, many people say going to Berkeley will give me an upperhand in getting a "better" job.
What's your suggestion?
2007-03-02
06:12:53
·
4 answers
·
asked by
krndhl3
2
in
Higher Education (University +)