Philosophy - May 2007

2007-05-17 10:00:23 · 11 answers · asked by God ◊ Machine 4

i said so.............

2007-05-17 09:46:39 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a quote from a movie called "O God". What are your opinions on it?

"The heart is the temple in which all truth resides."

2007-05-17 09:46:28 · 8 answers · asked by IG 2

and depends on nothing else and does it include the idea that the mind is no seperate from the body?

2007-05-17 09:30:30 · 4 answers · asked by PookyBoo 1

2007-05-17 09:22:48 · 81 answers · asked by Banshee 7

2007-05-17 08:38:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 07:50:14 · 12 answers · asked by almanza_ma 1

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LIFE? it is what it is ?!?!?!?!?
THE QUESTION IS THE ANSWER

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LIFE? ?!?!?!?

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF LIFE? THE QUESTION IS THE ANSWER. ?!?!?!
IT IS WHAT IT IS

QUOTE - Albert Einstein ON SHOULD LOOK FOR WHAT IS NOT WHAT SHOULD BE.
When the solution is simple, God is answering."
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
"The important thing is to not stop questioning. "
- Albert Einstein

2007-05-17 07:46:38 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 07:45:14 · 14 answers · asked by Shahid 7

I would like to hear your detailed thoughts.

2007-05-17 07:42:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I am studing Ethics in a business class

2007-05-17 07:33:26 · 18 answers · asked by Jasmeen 3

Is Einstein wrong about imagination to be more powerful than knowledge?

2007-05-17 07:32:00 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 06:43:43 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 06:41:52 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

In order for it to fit into your worldview?

For example:
If your value is 'respect for all others', are your actions and treatment of others a true representation of how u really feel about them as individuals (parts). Or do you feel compelled to go by values of respect for humanity (the whole) which may cause you to alter your exchanges with another.

Does this mean that you learn not to react to the actual individual and his/her particular situation, but rather to abide by a set of axioms that aren't precisely relevant.

Do you cast aside your ability to relate to 'another' in order to relate to 'others'?

2007-05-17 06:29:46 · 6 answers · asked by (notso)Gloriouspipecleaner 3

2007-05-17 06:28:15 · 10 answers · asked by Stephen W 1

2007-05-17 06:00:25 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok maybe kill is the worse case intention. But say you went into the future from the year 2007 to the year 2027 to see yourself in the future. The problem with that is that between that 20 year time gap, wouldent you be missing or something?
i mean if u leave the year 2007, technically you wouldent reappear until the year 2027 so u technically didnt exist to grow old or anything. Maybe u can send a video camera to see yourself in the future, but i dont think u would be actually physically be able to actually meet yourself, am i right?
The same goes for if u travel in the past, but i think thats a little more lenient because the only way there would be problems is if you do kill yourself in the past, you wouldent be alive to exist in the future to do that in the first place. But u can probably meet yourself in the past beacause there is no missing time gap. But it would be totally ausome to see what happens if i kill myself in past, right? Maybe the space time continum will explode.

2007-05-17 05:50:06 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Can someone that cannot communicate be said to be intelligent,or does intelligence lie in the receiving of the information,i have recently read something about this and wondered what your thoughts were.

2007-05-17 05:49:15 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 05:48:59 · 6 answers · asked by charlie 1

Surely, the ultimate aim of engaging in moral behaviour is to bring about goodness in the world and to lessen pain and unhappiness.

I can see that by adopting moral maxims, we can bring about more positive consequences in the world than if we do not, but how can deontological moral philosophers maintain that the 'goodness' is in the maxim itself?

2007-05-17 04:50:55 · 9 answers · asked by tuthutop 2

if yes...then, when?

:)

2007-05-17 04:41:48 · 17 answers · asked by *~Hope~* 3

Or just a load of different perspectives?

2007-05-17 04:23:18 · 34 answers · asked by abluebobcat 4

different than a chat room?

2007-05-17 04:04:33 · 9 answers · asked by bagel lover 3

and for those who think they have none, what do you use when you have to make a real fast disission?

2007-05-17 03:49:40 · 14 answers · asked by freebird31wizard 6

Starting with the assumption that god is capable of doing everything : can god create a very heavy stone, so heavy that god himself cannot lift it up?

2007-05-17 02:41:01 · 12 answers · asked by mustang_lost 1

How different would you or your life be?

2007-05-17 02:25:10 · 26 answers · asked by ragdoll 3

2007-05-17 01:31:40 · 14 answers · asked by D.W 6

* Palestinians facing cleansing & starving in their own land by the jews of Israel & those supporting them outside.
* Palestinians are all despair,starving under Israel's & the world seige.
* every Palestinian has atleast one member of his family killed by the jews in Israel.
* Israel exercising daily orgenized terror against the Palestinians.
* As palestinians life became like hell, so they try to fight their terrorizing agressor by any available mean including stones.
WORLD, WAKE UP & COME BACK TO YOUR SENSE!!!

2007-05-17 01:13:48 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-05-17 01:11:24 · 13 answers · asked by guru 7