English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - November 2006

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

2006-11-20 08:05:39 · 15 answers · asked by Neutral 1

2006-11-20 07:57:09 · 25 answers · asked by Whatever 3

This is ultimately (at least at this juncture of the human endeavor/experience) a purely philosophical inquiry. However, as a first mental approximation analogy/conceptual aid, you might wish to consider "Being" to be equivalent to The Primordial Big Bang Singularity, and prior to Space and Time (or other dimensionalities thereof) having even come into play (as we know them). The question is: Could such a state/an entity (or as you might wish to denote it) be nullified in its very "Is-ness" (i.e. beyond any notions of dimensionality and Universal Becoming)?

... Also how would you treat any possible residual "Nothingness" issues in that regard? Would you, for instance, amalgamate all Nothingness concerns as mere “Being anomalies” and otherwise "artificial constructs" held in Being’s mirror, or would you label "Nothingness" the nullified state itself?

Continued ........

2006-11-20 07:54:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

i know some people think it is God's creation, but I don't think so. I mean don't get offended people but... come on!!!!!!!!!!

2006-11-20 07:40:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 07:22:16 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

what lifes mean???

2006-11-20 06:32:44 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 06:24:28 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 06:16:42 · 9 answers · asked by mad 1

2006-11-20 06:14:51 · 4 answers · asked by argeo p 1

I thing we are not heading to the right track of unifying the world or we are simply deceptive to ourselves. If I may ask can we see the road to unity and order using organisations if we form ourselves as a network in fighting the various causes but with the agenda of bringing forth people of the world together through our various ways of reaching out to them?

2006-11-20 06:14:01 · 5 answers · asked by caliphate 1

2006-11-20 05:42:53 · 23 answers · asked by 2 good 2 miss 6

Death hates vampires becuase vampires found a way to cheat death. What is your answers? This just for fun .

2006-11-20 05:41:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think there will ever be a computer that can rival the human brain?

2006-11-20 05:35:35 · 14 answers · asked by jacqueswht 1

2006-11-20 05:31:52 · 9 answers · asked by old_brain 5

2006-11-20 05:27:15 · 14 answers · asked by Little Chip 3

I WANT A PROPER ANSWER DO NOT PUT 42!!!!

2006-11-20 05:21:19 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 04:55:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2

In the midst of anger, do we say things we really don't mean? Or do we actually speak the truth? What is your true opinion? Thanks!!!

2006-11-20 04:42:18 · 33 answers · asked by Yahoo Anwers 5

Apart from partying and amassing toys....WHY do you LIVE?

2006-11-20 04:36:43 · 10 answers · asked by kit walker 6

2006-11-20 04:17:59 · 17 answers · asked by Derrick w 1

2006-11-20 04:04:36 · 11 answers · asked by mad 1

2006-11-20 03:52:01 · 46 answers · asked by Anonymous

and why?

2006-11-20 03:42:24 · 57 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 03:41:45 · 6 answers · asked by twist 1

infact i am confused about this concept of the political. some people think it is concerned with the sharing and the shaping of power, authority, and influence.others also think of it as a significant pattern of human relationship that involves to some extent the involvement of conflict and integration in all sort of human endevor. i therefore want a clear understanding of which of them is correct and very acceptable to be used in the explanation of the concept of the political?

2006-11-20 03:34:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-20 03:33:02 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers