English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is ultimately (at least at this juncture of the human endeavor/experience) a purely philosophical inquiry. However, as a first mental approximation analogy/conceptual aid, you might wish to consider "Being" to be equivalent to The Primordial Big Bang Singularity, and prior to Space and Time (or other dimensionalities thereof) having even come into play (as we know them). The question is: Could such a state/an entity (or as you might wish to denote it) be nullified in its very "Is-ness" (i.e. beyond any notions of dimensionality and Universal Becoming)?

... Also how would you treat any possible residual "Nothingness" issues in that regard? Would you, for instance, amalgamate all Nothingness concerns as mere “Being anomalies” and otherwise "artificial constructs" held in Being’s mirror, or would you label "Nothingness" the nullified state itself?

Continued ........

2006-11-20 07:54:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

… Please elaborate on your answer with as much detail as you would like – I am specifically interested in your views and NOT cut and paste quotations/references from other sources. Also, please note that this is merely a philosophical inquest and not a statement against anyone’s faith (or even lack thereof), if you have in any way been offended by this question or feel that you have little to contribute, kindly move on. Serious answers only, please.

2006-11-20 07:55:39 · update #1

6 answers

whaaaa?

2006-11-20 08:17:52 · answer #1 · answered by Whatever 3 · 0 2

you know...i look at this one and i look and it just seems over complicated and blurry. maybe someone else can, (or has) say what you want to hear. (you know i never peak ahead of time.) you seem to want to nail concepts that shouldn't be nailed, can't be. mathematicians like their formulas so much that sometimes they forget they are really only trying to paint pictures of concepts, sometimes very abstract concepts....have you ever listened to Neal Diamond? he said it best i think. I AM! is a cry that can't be quantified!

2006-11-20 22:09:18 · answer #2 · answered by sheepherder 4 · 0 1

The answer is no. Imagine a whole big void of nothingness!!!
Seriously, you know what Einstein said about imagination.

2006-11-20 17:10:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I prefer strawberries with whipped cream, but I prefer Julianne Moore (better than that).

2006-11-20 18:39:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

AGAIN, YOU PEOPLE THINK TOO MUCH. TRYING JUST LIVING & ENJOYING IT

2006-11-20 19:06:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

No.

2006-11-20 23:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by Seeker 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers