English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Philosophy - September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Arts & Humanities Philosophy

who believes love is a many sided thing. and that certain types of are sacred and for only two people but that there is also the univirsal love that we share with strangers? Love should be given without fear and shared by man kind if we all thought like this no one would get hurt cause wed all be busy loving eachother. maybe im not making sense but i wish people would see that love has different parts within it. you can love your friend but not like your lover or father or that halirous aquaintince. im not saying we should be loving everyone the same way but that we should love until we hate.

2006-09-07 12:32:55 · 13 answers · asked by a perfectly contradictory cat 3

I would live in Disney Land FOREVER!!!

2006-09-07 12:25:11 · 14 answers · asked by Black D93 2

I am very grateful when I wake up, and then think, that could have been the end of me!

2006-09-07 12:14:14 · 40 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 11:53:23 · 19 answers · asked by freshcalmbreeze 1

2006-09-07 11:42:53 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 11:42:28 · 8 answers · asked by sue o 2

2006-09-07 11:30:51 · 23 answers · asked by axis mentis 2

one would be OK too.

2006-09-07 11:25:30 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 11:07:09 · 21 answers · asked by Le eastender 2

This information would be hard to find but invaluable for my father and I.

2006-09-07 10:26:46 · 4 answers · asked by CB 1

are they soluting the tribes of africa, or trying to find their center of gravity, or what, do they think it looks good? those skaterishpunkishgothish people?

2006-09-07 10:26:46 · 11 answers · asked by billy 3

i need this answer in 1 day

2006-09-07 10:20:48 · 9 answers · asked by anomaly394323 1

i just thought that it would be a good research topic!!

2006-09-07 10:11:41 · 11 answers · asked by heather d 2

Why am I still alive?

Why are you still alive?

I will be driving and I have anxiety and I will be wondering about the afterlife, should I take a chance to see what it's like. Because I want to be in a place where I will never die. Why live when you can experience the afterlife. I just wish people can just skip life and go on to heaven, because I don't believe one soul is in hell right now. No one. Why waste time living, when I can go to heaven right now. I just believe in the afterlife, at least I won't have to worry about dieing again.

2006-09-07 10:08:36 · 15 answers · asked by Jabaris H 2

2006-09-07 10:08:34 · 12 answers · asked by tinoitsueq 1

When speaking of another in the English Language, we say “he/she” and “him/her”. It seems modern society puts an emphasis on sexual equality. So, why not have a pronoun that addresses an individual without making not of their sex? “Them” and “their” don’t seem to work because they usually refer to a group, not one.

2006-09-07 09:49:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a concept is needed to begin, how did an Intelligent being like God begin to question any of his concepts (or images)? If there was nothing to use to build a concept (nothing in his toolset), how did things materialize into being? Unless like a composer that creates and writes music, it comes from his genetic traits. But genetic traits come from predecessors and God doesn't have any.

2006-09-07 09:32:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

it's my belief that the lines are being drawn clearer each day. The cruel and unkind flock together, and the kind and meek wait and pray.

2006-09-07 09:28:10 · 11 answers · asked by abigalsky 2

2006-09-07 09:26:46 · 45 answers · asked by shsimon 2

What have you done or contributed to the world or situation to help our nation to still rate a home of the free?

2006-09-07 09:26:05 · 12 answers · asked by drshownufflove 1

2006-09-07 08:59:50 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 08:37:35 · 36 answers · asked by OuiJa 1

and I say BRAZIL RULES,

2006-09-07 08:33:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 08:31:21 · 23 answers · asked by bfrank 2

2006-09-07 08:24:30 · 33 answers · asked by Andy C 2

I don't believe evil must exist for good to exist. Let us imagine that there is a possible world in which the only existent is God. God (according to the Judeo-Christian tradition) is wholly good: evil is
neither coextensive nor coterminous with God (please overlook the issue of temporality or atemporality vis-a-vis God for now). In this possible world, it seems that one could say that good exists. But would evil obtain in a possible world wherein (a holy) God is the only (possible) existent? In what way could evil obtain in such a possible world, granting the premises? If only good obtained in this world and evil did not obtain, would it not be true to say that good could exist without the concomitant existence of evil (in this case)? If what I am proposing is logically possible, then it is not necessarily true (maybe it is even untrue) that one needs evil in order for good to exist.

2006-09-07 08:22:40 · 17 answers · asked by sokrates 4

2006-09-07 08:10:16 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-07 08:03:55 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers