Is it of more value to do a good deed toward a large but distant problem (global warming, war, poverty) where the harm is great but your chance of making a notable impact is small, or to apply against a smaller need closer to yourself (mentor to a child, plate of food to an elder neighbor) that would have a larger impact on a smaller scale problem. If you choose to do both, how do you decide where to use your limited resources of money and time?
2007-01-07
07:54:25
·
18 answers
·
asked by
PJ H
5
in
Philosophy