As a Republican, I acknowledge that President Bush has only held his current set of beliefs for "relatively" short period of time.
In contrast, the president of Iran has been a member of the violent "Death to America" crowd for 30-ish years.
As the dems have been so unsuccessful at changing the heart and mind of a relative newbie like Bush, how do they plan to change the heart and mind of a die-hard wacko who's held his beliefs for decades, and has only grown more radical and powerful over time.
Bush should be easy-sell for democrat charm compared to Akmadamouminininajamedajad. Would the dems be more credible as "power-lifters" if they weren't impotent against what they would call a "lightweight dumbell" like Bush?
Are they saving their persuasive charm for the big game with Ahcknadimenimoumaneijabajib?
2007-07-27
10:30:17
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics