As a Republican, I acknowledge that President Bush has only held his current set of beliefs for "relatively" short period of time.
In contrast, the president of Iran has been a member of the violent "Death to America" crowd for 30-ish years.
As the dems have been so unsuccessful at changing the heart and mind of a relative newbie like Bush, how do they plan to change the heart and mind of a die-hard wacko who's held his beliefs for decades, and has only grown more radical and powerful over time.
Bush should be easy-sell for democrat charm compared to Akmadamouminininajamedajad. Would the dems be more credible as "power-lifters" if they weren't impotent against what they would call a "lightweight dumbell" like Bush?
Are they saving their persuasive charm for the big game with Ahcknadimenimoumaneijabajib?
2007-07-27
10:30:17
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
no, no, no... bad boy "dano718boy", you're displaying the typical democrat inability to read, punctuate and comprehend. The dems say we should negotiate, and the question was how does their poor track record of negotiating with a small fish translate into an implicit talent for negotiating with a massive fish? ....you may reread the question and make another attempt at answering it if you wish.
2007-07-27
10:53:04 ·
update #1