Is very confusing. I notice in your Constitution, does say well regulated militia, not average citizen, could bear arms. Was it for protection against invaders, as you had no standing army at the time? Was it to protect against intruders? Was it to rebel against your government if necessary? If so, how could you hope to defeat it now with only guns, even automatic weapons, when faced with tanks, aircraft etc.?
2007-04-25
02:32:56
·
6 answers
·
asked by
gortamor
4
in
Law & Ethics