Why does the Vatican deny Jesus was a full Roman Citizen?
To fulfil the Jewish prophecy, by Jewish law (the Tanakh/Old Testament), Jesus had to be of the bloodline of David, the true kings of Israel- from King Zedekiah via his only surviving child-Princess Tamar. Regardless of disinformation, my Jewish law, you have to be "born" by royal bloodline to be the messiah.
Under Roman Law 2,000 years ago, all Roman citizens were subject to the protection and process of Pontius Pilate, while all non-Roman citizens were under the Jewish civil and religious courts.
It makes total sense by law, if Jesus was a prince of Judah, to be brought before Pilate, by law. But the New Testament makes no sense and contradicts historic fact if it maintains the fiction that he was not Roman and subject to Jewish law. If this was the case, the Sadducee High Priests could have had him killed any day ot the week (no excuses stand up).
So why does the Vatican deny Jesus was a full Roman Citizen?
2007-04-06
01:38:17
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Religion & Spirituality