these days everybody focus on 2 players:federer and nadal.but they aren't the only 2 talented players i saw in past few years.
i first saw andy playing back in 2001 and i said to my self that this guy is very talented!since then i tried to follow his career and all i can say that he constanly improved his game.
then it was only his serve, forehand and,most of all, the desire to win.now he can hit a backhand not to mention that he is starting to look good at the net,he dare to make a volley.
all this should make him a real grand slam titles challenger!
the things i don't like at andy:
1.lack of flexibility in his strategy, and the most recent example is the wimbledon qf with gasquet when he didn't try anything to stop that fantastic backhand that gasquet used to humiliate him;
2.mental weekness.he can hit an ace when he need the most ,can win the game even from 0-40,but cannot keep the same level 'till the end.and what facing federer meens to him, no comment!
2007-07-23
05:14:35
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous