Today i was watching the news, and was informed about a pedophile who takes pictures of little girls in his free time. Upon being discovered, he was questioned, and later put on a restraining order when he admitted to be a pedophile. After that, he still went within 30 feet of girl younger then 18 years of age. Now he may have a indefinite restraining order.
Some odd years ago, papparazzi chased Princess Diana in a high speed chase ultimately leading to her death. Nothing was done to punish the news stations, and they have never apologized since then, until this year. First of all, i think that everyone has a right to not be filmed. But i also think that this pedophile was treated unfairly. Does anyone else believe that he was? Pedophilia is a crime, but is it really a crime if the pictures do not exhibit a sexual nature? Also, think about how an indefinite restraining order will limit where he goes. He wont even be able to walk down a street. Continued in added deatils.
2007-08-22
11:19:11
·
1 answers
·
asked by
babsa_90
4