This is for those who argue, not those who honestly question. You know which one you are:
Why is it that some athiests play the "prove there is a God" card, and then base their belief (or non belief on that)? To put it another way, how is "Prove God exists" an argument?
For one, there is plenty of proof out there. If you choose to reject it, that's fine. It's up to you what you decide to believe.
But consider this. If YOU choose to make the claim that God doesn't exist, then why don't YOU take responsibility and prove it to yourself. Because it's YOUR claim, the burden of proof is on YOU. Therefore why do I need to prove anything? It's not my claim, it's yours. Why should your belief depend on me? Who am I to have that kind of authority?
Is it not your decision? So how is it logical to argue or base a belief on what I can or can't prove. Why not prove your own ideas yourself?
2006-09-20
16:29:26
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Consuming Fire
7
in
Religion & Spirituality