the world average hrs/wk have to be somewhere round 50-60, taking into account american housewives work over 90hrs/wk [according to some figures on the net] british housewives, ive seen figures of 70 hrs/wk [book 'housewife'] - the 90% of ppl on less than $1/hr must work hard just to survive
& no one can work more than 100-120 hrs/wk longterm, so no one can justify more than twice average pay by hard work, longer hours, gruelling hours, etc
[i think we can assume that a person working 100-120 hr/wk is not working harder than world average hardness/hr]
if we look at hardness of work per hr, the range of hardness of work is even smaller - i cant see that the hardest working person can work much more than 10% harder than the average/hr - & i cant see that the least hardworking person can work much less than 10% less hard/hr without getting fired
by hardness of work, i do not mean productivity, which is affected by machinehelp, muscle, brain, which are gifts, not the person
2006-10-15
09:34:52
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Economics