You know in the scientific method, you make a hypothesis and then do experiments? well the hypothesis is proved wrong if only ONE thing proves it wrong. You can't prove evolution wrong with experimenation. how is evolution scientific? like, I can't run experiments in a lab or a test tube to show that macroevolution is possible. I understand that microevolution exists, it has been proven. However, a scientist cannot go and make an experiment to test macroevolution. you can't observe animals evolving, can you? I've just been pondering what science really is and what some people make it out to be.
For instance, the speed at which objects accelerate in free fall on the earth is 9.8 m/s/s. If someone performed an experiment and discovered that it was really 15 m/s/s, that "law" would be proven wrong. this can't be done to evolution, making it unscientific. isn't this correct, if I follow the scientific method?
How is the theory of evolution scientific if it can't be proven wrong?
2006-10-17
09:57:32
·
7 answers
·
asked by
?
4