English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Astronomy & Space - November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

2007-11-29 02:03:26 · 2 answers · asked by sundeep 9732 1

2007-11-29 02:02:39 · 20 answers · asked by pallavi t 1

Sudden thought and am curious.... LOL

2007-11-29 01:59:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

So the scientists say.But what is the clear evidence or is just a guess

2007-11-29 01:46:19 · 25 answers · asked by colin 2

This is something that is spoken in myths, fables and astrology.

However, in reality, do you think man can do it one day? If humans can do it, how do you think they will do it?

2007-11-29 01:43:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-29 01:37:14 · 8 answers · asked by Ghost of Rasputin 2

Maybe they're made of other stuff than just gas, solid and liquid. Maybe they're not organic at all but still living in a sense we don't know yet. I'm guessing we -as in mankind- are not even aware to what "Life" means to a full extend. So maybe do you think other pyshical conditions are possible in this universe, or maybe in another one?

2007-11-29 01:10:48 · 16 answers · asked by Ghost of Rasputin 2

http://www.aa2sbu.org/MoonSunJoyDutta.jpg

I see this in the sky all the time.

According to the way the moon is lit up, surely the sun should be 'above' the moon in the sky from the point of view of the camera?

How can the lit-up part of the moon 'face' away from the sun in the sky sometimes?

2007-11-29 01:00:18 · 14 answers · asked by Gabriel H 3

What if, due to some electromagnetic interference, the earth's rotation decreased? It is obvious that there would be more hours in the day, but I always assumed that there is a certain amount of centrifugal force that affects gravity. It the earth's rotation decreased, then there would be less centrifugal force, which means gravity would increase, right? How weird would that be? How would we adapt to the increased weight? Would the affect be so dramatic that it could kill any of us?

2007-11-29 00:58:54 · 12 answers · asked by Tominator 2

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7116834.stm

2007-11-28 21:43:32 · 21 answers · asked by John Smith 1

The theorists say this is what wiped out the dinosaurs. We've seen it popularized in movies and it looks truly terrifying. I know we have some kind of global vigil going on to track large space objects as they might impact Earth. But are we really geared up enough to catch this in the skies before we get hit? Would we be able to divert a direct hit with our current capabilities in outer space? Would it take an atomic bomb to dessentigrate or vaporize one of these large asteroids or meteorites on it's way to Planet Earth? If we are not adequately prepared now, what do we need to do to safeguard the future of our planet from a disaster of this magnitude?

2007-11-28 21:35:08 · 19 answers · asked by John S. 5

The Big Bang will expand for ever (the Big Chill). Infinity is by definition something that can't be measured. How can it have a start in the Big Bang?
The closest thing to infinity and eternity we can imagine is a two-dimensional being on a volumetric surface such as a sphere. It can move for ever without reaching an end. But it doesn't have a start either, right?

2007-11-28 20:29:50 · 13 answers · asked by Michel Verheughe 7

2007-11-28 20:17:15 · 9 answers · asked by MIke y 2

2007-11-28 19:05:15 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why doesn't this year have a leap year?
http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/index.html?year=2100&country=1
I thought every year divisible by 4 had a 02/29.

2007-11-28 17:55:30 · 6 answers · asked by nemahknatut88 2

do the aliens present ........... where do they live

2007-11-28 17:41:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

If a smaller crater on the moon overlays a larger one, you can conclude that:
a.both craters are very old
b.the smaller crater is younger than the larger one
c.the smaller crater is older than the lager one
d.both craters are the same age

2007-11-28 16:37:42 · 8 answers · asked by Tommy 1

please don't bother because i allready know the answer.
i just want to know why do we forget great men of our time
about whome will only be able to read in the future but we can touch them allready put them in our fillings just for probable references?have you ever wished to e-mail him?

2007-11-28 16:07:14 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-28 15:07:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

I need to know soon so please answer my question i'd really appreciate it. If you know any other info on gamma rays then please share.

2007-11-28 14:48:17 · 9 answers · asked by Canon 1

Multibillions of dollars are being spent to do space missions. Missions like Mars are finding some alternative place to live on, but before we find suitable enviornment outside earth, our own enviornment would extinct and we won't be here. So why not use those billions of dollars to fix our enviornment (finding alternatives for petroleum etc.)?

This is my position paper. I really need your opinions on the topic!!
Thanks!

2007-11-28 14:46:08 · 19 answers · asked by *sumASTRONAUT* 1

Is it humanely possible to create a northern lights effect on a surface, much like the one effect in Balto? I know it can be done digitally, but im talking about actually making one on a hill at night or at least something to that effect

2007-11-28 14:34:53 · 4 answers · asked by yankee_hata_4ever 1

Earth, Mercury, Venus, Ceres, Uranus, Ganymede, Comet Halley, Mars, Titan, Jupiter, Pluto, Moon

2007-11-28 14:27:42 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

100,000 mpc
1950 mpc
40 mpc
2050 mpc
0.025 mpc

2007-11-28 14:16:34 · 1 answers · asked by webb_ar 1

-no nuclei heavier than helium could form since there werent any electrons formed
-no stable nuclei exist with masses of 5 or 8 hydrogen masses
- the temperature and density were too low
-the helium nucleus is unstable
- all heavy nuclei are unstable

2007-11-28 14:10:06 · 13 answers · asked by webb_ar 1

I'm told that the sun with a mass of 1 and a luminosity of 1 is expected to live 10 billion years......

Then what is a star with a mass of 50 and a luminosity of 40,000 supposed to live?

The expected answer is approximately 1million years but the best i've come up with is 12.5million

anyone have any insight?

2007-11-28 14:09:36 · 3 answers · asked by John r 2

please i need an answer today or tommorow

2007-11-28 14:06:33 · 5 answers · asked by thefernteam 2

fedest.com, questions and answers