Astronomy & Space - January 2007

I haven't seen or heard anything about the Soviets or any other country with a space program landing on the moon since the US landed in '69. Is the moon now official property of the US?

2007-01-17 08:03:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

and who would watch them?

2007-01-17 07:56:12 · 5 answers · asked by strings 1

2007-01-17 07:53:04 · 13 answers · asked by strings 1

After the last star and last planet... What then? Is there more universe's ore just this one?? Dose it go on and on and on?? It can't be everlasting?? whats out side of this very large box??
I know no one knows this answer, just thought I could get you thinking!!
I dont know whats out there.. I dare not guess... What do you think??

2007-01-17 07:26:32 · 35 answers · asked by cjdec 2

i heard that people are working on building a city or something on mars so we all can live there when earth explodes. Is this true?

2007-01-17 07:23:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

eva models with display cases

2007-01-17 07:12:45 · 2 answers · asked by JAMES D 1

My question about Concorde being a hoax was aimed at those who use the fact that we have not been back to the moon siince 1972 as "proof" that the moon landings were fixed.

But there is so much paranoia now regarding conspiracies that readers took it seriously.

Concorde was 1960's technology. Concorde is no more. We have not got a supersonic airliner, and one is not on the drawing board. So, by the moon landing hoaxers arguments, Concorde was a fraud and never flew at mach 2 at all, because we haven't got an airliner that even exceeds mach 1.

2007-01-17 07:04:22 · 2 answers · asked by nick s 6

If most of the stars in the universe, or at least our galaxy are red dwarfs, much cooler than our sun, could life evolve on a planet with a red dwarf as its sun? Also, would Arnold Rimmer be there, quoting Space Corps directives? (Sorry, couldn't resist a little humor. For those scientists unfamiliar, "Red Dwarf" is a BBC2 comedy).

2007-01-17 06:48:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I need to know guys please.Thank You.

2007-01-17 06:44:23 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is there any measurement of the ration of impacts the moon takes vs. impacts the earth takes?

2007-01-17 06:41:25 · 12 answers · asked by mullah robertson 4

2007-01-17 06:27:57 · 2 answers · asked by Speedoguy 3

i'v heard that people in space age more slower than in th earth. why?

2007-01-17 06:24:08 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Well, if we haven't got a supersonic airliner now and one isn't on the drawing board, how come it was supposedly developed in the 1960's. How come we can't do it now?

(That is one of the lame reason's people have for supporting the notion that the moon landings were not real, so by the same token Concorde was a hoax. It never flew at twice the speed of sound. It couldn't have done, because we can't build a supersonic airliner now)

2007-01-17 05:42:38 · 4 answers · asked by nick s 6

What's the actual date?

2007-01-17 05:34:31 · 12 answers · asked by Nothing's Forever 2

We all know that Jan 1 (Gregorian) is New Years Day, but how was it determined which day of the earth's cycle would be Jan 1st? Why did they not choose the Winter Solstice which is 8 or 9 days earlier? Who made the determination of which day would be the first day of the year?

2007-01-17 05:27:30 · 3 answers · asked by Jim S 1

size, shape, composition, atmosphere, density, distance from the sun, surface, and moons

2007-01-17 05:24:27 · 2 answers · asked by lend322 4

let me know when i do or did something right

2007-01-17 05:22:54 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-17 05:22:14 · 25 answers · asked by izzy 1

A.The sun will go supernova
B.The sun will consume itself
C.The sun will turn into a red giant
D.The sun will callapse and turn into a black hole

2007-01-17 05:12:35 · 9 answers · asked by Prince_Krona 2

I admit that I read Dan Brown's book Deception point that brought this up in my mind. I personally don't believe we'll colonize the moon and Mars. I don't know what benefit there is to knowing that there are planets out there that we can take pictures of. I don't know much about NASA, so can someone tell me why we spend billions of dollars on the space program?? Has it given us anything? Satelites are the only thing I can think of that touches my daily life.

2007-01-17 05:08:56 · 12 answers · asked by BaseballGrrl 6

moses will rise on the 11th

2007-01-17 05:05:51 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

You just answered a question by saying that there is no life out there, meaning space. You said it has been proven again, and again. Who has proved this? How many times?
I think that since we are alive, it has been proven otherwise.

2007-01-17 04:51:13 · 3 answers · asked by au197_0 3

I have seen a documentry and they said that everything that scientists are discovering now is already written in quran (a book wrote by Prophet Muhammad Pbuh thousands of years ago!!!) is that true?Answer people, answer!!!

2007-01-17 04:29:22 · 8 answers · asked by alilistrong 1

2007-01-17 04:26:51 · 12 answers · asked by DAVID 1

2007-01-17 04:23:20 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

In my second semester of college, I'm taking descriptive astronomy. I've always been VERY interested in it, since before I can really recall. I've always looked up at the stars and asked questions about them. I'm worried though, that it may not be what I expect. Do I have reason for this worry, or is it just a case of the "What if's"?

2007-01-17 04:23:17 · 4 answers · asked by lilfireyballofhate 3

2007-01-17 04:11:35 · 10 answers · asked by Roller 2

Scientists seem confident that the rate of expansion of the universe is increasing. I don't believe this, and i want to know if my theory has an flaws to it.

The evidence, as far as im aware, for the universe expanding faster is that the father away from earth we look, the faster galaxies are moving away from us. The galaxies etc. that are billions of light years away are massively red shifted, showing that they are moving away from us at a phenomenal rate.

The thing i dont understand is, these are galaxies billions of light years distant, the light from them has taken billions of light years to reach us. Meaning the light left these galaxies during the 'early years' of the universe. So surely the fact that they are red shifted is because back then, when the big bang was still recent, everything WAS expanding at a phenominal rate, and now, billions of years later, things have slowed down, which is why nearby galaxies dont appear to be travelling away as fast....

2007-01-17 04:05:01 · 8 answers · asked by Johnno 2

2007-01-17 03:48:39 · 15 answers · asked by milt19777 2

In a recent article on the BBC science page regarding both the declassification of Pluto, an ice covered object, and a rugby ball shaped planet also covered in water ice, it posses the question where the water came from?

2007-01-17 03:46:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous