My question about Concorde being a hoax was aimed at those who use the fact that we have not been back to the moon siince 1972 as "proof" that the moon landings were fixed.
But there is so much paranoia now regarding conspiracies that readers took it seriously.
Concorde was 1960's technology. Concorde is no more. We have not got a supersonic airliner, and one is not on the drawing board. So, by the moon landing hoaxers arguments, Concorde was a fraud and never flew at mach 2 at all, because we haven't got an airliner that even exceeds mach 1.
2007-01-17
07:04:22
·
2 answers
·
asked by
nick s
6
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Astronomy & Space