Astronomy & Space - January 2007

2007-01-23 07:19:05 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 07:18:30 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 07:17:02 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 07:12:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 07:04:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so, where do I look to see it?

2007-01-23 06:55:24 · 3 answers · asked by Wild at Heart 1

I understand that the space shuttle needs rockets to get up into space, why can't they put small rockets inside the ship. also why extacly do they need big rockets and what do they excatly do besides burn off fuel?

2007-01-23 06:47:22 · 7 answers · asked by morgana_tyler 1

my science teacher has showed movies about it and were talking about it and i saw on yahoo that the moon will eventualy crumble,,,,,,

2007-01-23 06:40:43 · 8 answers · asked by Hi, how the heck r ya? 2

Is it because it has the most materials and substances on it?

2007-01-23 06:17:32 · 10 answers · asked by Momin2005 1

2007-01-23 06:08:24 · 3 answers · asked by emerici 1

We have learned how to destroy things completly by introducing matter with antimatter anhilating the object and turning it into pure energy that will eventually dissapat but can we create matter? have there been any therioes on how to create matter, reverse the process of anhilation? or is it completly improssible?

2007-01-23 05:57:24 · 16 answers · asked by Fastdog 2

My son is doing a science project. He has to research the planet Neptune, one of the questions the teacher wants to know is why does this planet have moons. I'm not sure how to answer this questions. So if anybody can send links about this please respond. Thank you.

2007-01-23 05:55:23 · 5 answers · asked by karlenafeather 1

2007-01-23 05:45:20 · 8 answers · asked by flavorlicious 2

2007-01-23 05:30:11 · 3 answers · asked by Me-Shell 1

Our gang of evil space terrorists has found a chance too good to pass up. Flying out to 2001-YB5, they affix rocket engines to the 36 billion kilogram asteroid and, at 9:50:24 UT on 29 Apr 2018, they impart a modest delta-vee of 95.31181 m/s in the direction of RA 13h 32m 40.956s, DEC +18.25417 degrees.

Orbital elements of 2001 YB5 (initial).
a = 2.349557177836 au
e = 0.862427471513
i = 5.490700413641 deg
L = 109.3451209415 deg
w = 114.2474452629 deg
T = JD 2453637.57768 (1:51:51.552 UT, 24 Sep 2005)

Orbital elements of Earth.
a = 1.0000001124 au
e = 0.0167102192
i = 0
L = 0
w = 103.078101 deg
T = JD 2454468.667 (4:00:28.8 UT, 3 Jan 2008)

Will the asteroid hit Earth? If so, when?
What would be the impact speed if it does?
What would be the energy in megatons TNT?
What are the elements of the transfer orbit?
If the asteroid meets Earth dead-center, what would be the latitude and longitude of the crater?

2007-01-23 05:28:33 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

12 step plans also acceptable.

2007-01-23 05:27:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

ffffa

2007-01-23 05:23:40 · 11 answers · asked by Sue A 1

NASA says they can deflect it if it gets too close, what do you think?

2007-01-23 04:54:39 · 15 answers · asked by msjinx39 3

2007-01-23 04:17:10 · 11 answers · asked by saravanan 1

i want to get a telescope as a present but i dont understand what lens size etc i need to get. needs to b a half decent one.

2007-01-23 03:44:36 · 5 answers · asked by krusty1 2

According to this planetary data table my teacher gave me, she wants to know how many time farther from the sun Pluto is then the Earth. She included to remember that Pluto time and difference are two different operations. Help!!

2007-01-23 03:39:44 · 11 answers · asked by Momin2005 1

One night, you observe two stars that have the same apparent magnitude. Could these two stars be giving off different amounts of light? Explain.

2007-01-23 03:35:11 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 03:32:05 · 7 answers · asked by Ptolemy 1

Is it still the "Big Bang" or are there others?

2007-01-23 03:18:07 · 5 answers · asked by hazydaze 5

2007-01-23 03:14:18 · 4 answers · asked by bacamacaamaca 1

2007-01-23 03:12:38 · 4 answers · asked by zebbie g 2

If a century=100 years

then arnt we still in the 20th century

100 x 20=2000

So why do people say were in the 21st century?

100 x 21=2100

We're in 2007, not 2107

So again, why do people say were in the 21st century?

2007-01-23 03:01:51 · 6 answers · asked by Maurice H 6

2007-01-23 03:00:09 · 2 answers · asked by Patasalada 1

2007-01-23 02:50:16 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-01-23 02:44:06 · 12 answers · asked by dv 1