Astronomy & Space - November 2006

like what is it and how does it become created??

2006-11-25 14:26:21 · 10 answers · asked by Sheeeep! 3

Let's assume that an object is orbitting a planet of 6 x 10 (21) tonnes, and the eccentricity of the orbit is 0. Would the objects orbit ever degrade? Assuming that the planet didn't have an atmosphere.

2006-11-25 14:21:35 · 6 answers · asked by Gavin S 3

Can u give me a link so I can have real information?

2006-11-25 14:17:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-25 13:30:56 · 11 answers · asked by djsevergreen46 2

also what is it's topography

2006-11-25 13:29:59 · 3 answers · asked by bambina 2

someone knows the conditions on Titan's surface?? and/or the environment?

2006-11-25 13:28:14 · 2 answers · asked by bambina 2

And another qustion which goes like this:
The sun is burning since billions of yrs. It has released tremendous amount of energy since then.According to Einstein,energy release is the result of mass lost. That means sun is continuously losing its mass since billions of yrs. According to Newton F= m1.m2/ d.d
Here the mass of the sun i.e. m2 is decreasing.And ultimately the value of F will be decreased. But still the sun is attracting the heavenly bodies with the same force..The earth and other planets have not yet left their orbits. How is this possible????How is it still balanced?????

2006-11-25 13:27:36 · 9 answers · asked by James 1

Do you think the US Space Program will be greatly affected without the Orbiter Fleet Of Shuttles?
My Opinion- I think it will considering for almost 30 years Nasa has been having Shuttle Based missions. Plus the current space station is occasionally re-supplied by a MPLM hauled by shuttle. Lastly most Nasa Astronauts are trained to fly shuttle and Space station, so crew training will change drastically.
Whats Your Opinion

2006-11-25 13:18:48 · 4 answers · asked by xpseth 2

SOMEONE KNOS TITAN (SATURNS' MOON) GRAVITATIONAL PULL OR MAYBE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE????

2006-11-25 13:02:59 · 1 answers · asked by bambina 2

I am a highschool student(grade 12) and have been interested in space. I love learning about space and related subjects. I want to be an Astronomer. The problem is it requires math and physics. I love math but I am not good at it. I struggle in math often but I feel like I can't live without solving problems. Is this going to be a problem or if I work really hard I might have a chance at it?

2006-11-25 12:46:27 · 7 answers · asked by pooja 1

Given that the universe is of infinite dimensions, could the "big bang" have been a localized event. one which has repeated somewhere in the universe several times? I have a difficult time believing that all the matter of the entire universe was compacted into any one location. Infinity can be a very hard concept to grasp but I do believe the universe has existed for infinity and will continue to do so. It just seems illogical to assume that there was no matter in the entire universe prior to any one astronomical event.

2006-11-25 12:46:04 · 12 answers · asked by ©2009 7

2006-11-25 12:11:39 · 13 answers · asked by gavrielz2002 1

Recently I have done a ton of research. Why does NASA have so few pictures of the moon walks? How could they really misplace and lose the greatest footage of modern film? Flag, shadow, and other conspiracy theories and that famous mockumentary aside -- where are all the pictures? And how come the astronauts "can't" remember if they saw stars? What is that about? NASA has so few photos of the actual moonwalk it is ridiculous. If the astronauts really traveled through the radiation belts, how come they didn't take their rings off? Wouldn't radiation conduct and bury itself in jewelry? How come the power cords to the rover don't hover in low gravity? I am really not looking for conpiracy theories, just facts.

2006-11-25 12:11:08 · 16 answers · asked by elklive 1

quantum information cannot persist in a void ruling out all particles and fields.

2006-11-25 11:58:20 · 11 answers · asked by peter c 2

I have a theory that absolute zero (which has never been able to be reached despite alot of effort put into it) can be reached only in the absolute epi-center (ironic name in this case) of a black hole. We know that heat is made by particles moving, and hence why it is difficult to create absolute zero on earth, but what if there were a hyper gravitational drive such as a black hole to help negate movement of particles; IE packing in particles so tightly into such a small area that they are unable to move at all. With enough gravitational force wouldn't the particles shatter under the forces and create plates similar to what the earth has for layers or would it pack them in like packing peanuts and create an absolute zero environment?
-Dan

2006-11-25 11:54:40 · 7 answers · asked by skidmarks56 2

2006-11-25 11:51:27 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

i know that is no air on the moon but does that mean that we can not literally "breath out" and " breath in"?

2006-11-25 11:45:08 · 7 answers · asked by      7

2006-11-25 11:30:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-25 10:51:20 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

why don't they apper like that on earths surface?

2006-11-25 10:28:21 · 14 answers · asked by super woman 1

solve right triangles with given parts-round off the results-the only figures are A=52 degrees and B=8.4

2006-11-25 10:18:34 · 3 answers · asked by lynn l 1

2006-11-25 09:58:54 · 37 answers · asked by josh h 1

I don't think a International space station vehicle that stay's parked in orbit with the I.S.S. is to far out in space in terms of fiction. The space shuttle could deliver such a craft much like the navy transports it's crafts down in the ship.( Electric tURBINE space craft ) Such a craft that could carry two people back and forth from I.S.S. to the moon and emergency use only back to Earth. This re- usable craft could be used on board by Russians, America and China and so forth, International systems command unit. A added International space station docking port would have to be built and added to the I.S.S. first. Solar sensors would be put on the moon to detect the Sun's solar ejection pre-warning systems back to the I.S.S. and transfer to Earth space command for future tracking systems. Buildind these new solar sensors not that hard to do on mounting pods on the Moon.

2006-11-25 09:48:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

???

2006-11-25 09:43:22 · 11 answers · asked by Jordan S 2

There must be more than just earth, anybody no any links to Doc's facts UFO'S etc etc ?

2006-11-25 09:42:48 · 11 answers · asked by 1960's_psych 2

What would happen? I need to figure somethings that would happen if we didn't revolve around the sun. I have only thought of we wouldn't have years? Its for a science project and i need to make a half a page of what would happen any ideas?

2006-11-25 09:26:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-25 08:21:22 · 5 answers · asked by Skitty 1

I kind of thought science would have come up with something to make housework easier by now. Not that I iron of course!!

2006-11-25 08:09:14 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

If I was to fold my (particularly big) sheet of paper in half, then it doubles it's height. If I fold it in half again, it is now four times it's original height. How many times must I fold it to make it reach the moon?

2006-11-25 08:07:55 · 13 answers · asked by Raygun 2

Please don't make this up, I'm really asking.

2006-11-25 07:59:55 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous